Anyway… there’s no congestion between Comcast and Level 3 connections, and we’re working collaboratively with Level 3. Given these facts, we have no reason to believe that Comcast is on their list.
Sure, because Level 3 is already paying Comcast to deliver traffic to your paying customers, right?
-- Hugo
From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> on behalf of Livingood, Jason <jason_living...@cable.comcast.com>Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 5:27 AM To: =JeffH; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Observations of an Internet Middleman (Level3) (was: RIP Network Neutrality (was: Wow its been quiet here... Hi Jeff – I noticed the question posed here so thought I’d respond, perhaps at risk of stirring up a hornet’s nest given how long the last thread was. ;-) Anyway… there’s no congestion between Comcast and Level 3 connections, and we’re working collaboratively with Level 3. Given these facts, we have no reason to believe that Comcast is on their list. - Jason Comcast On 5/8/14, 1:18 PM, "=JeffH" <jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com<mailto:jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com>> wrote: Level 3 accuses five unnamed US ISPs of abusing their market power in peering http://gigaom.com/2014/05/05/level-3-accuses-five-unnamed-us-isps-of-abusing-their-market-power-in-peering/ "...I’d love to see Cogent, Google and other providers release their data next, so even if the FCC doesn’t want to pursue this, a growing cry of consumer outrage could push the agency to do something about a very real and difficult problem that’s crippling access to video content on 5 U.S. broadband networks. Level 3 didn’t name names, but based on the deals Netflix has signed and the complaints it has made about AT&T, I’m confident that AT&T, Verizon and Comcast are among the five. "
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
