Hello,
After the recent amplification attacks involving NTP servers, John
Kristoff, a researcher with Team Cymru, kindly agreed to publish an
analysis of the history and timeline leading up to the attacks. Please
find his contribution on RIPE Labs:
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ntp-re
Brent Simmons is not given to ridiculous overreaction, nor is Lauren.
If you have domains registered with NetSol's registrar, it seems you
should probably do your diligence on this yourself:
http://inessential.com/2014/01/21/network_solutions_auto-enroll_1_850
I have not been fond of NetSol s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
$1800 for standard "Registrar Lock" services does sound a bit expensive. :-(
- - ferg
On 1/22/2014 10:03 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Brent Simmons is not given to ridiculous overreaction, nor is Lauren.
> If you have domains registered with NetSol
They also will change your domains to "auto renew" magically and punch
a credit card 90 days in advance of expiry so for example if a domain
expires in April expect a charge in January at the latest. Why? I
dunno, better to have the money now than later I guess.
You'll have to jump through hoops
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
> P.S. Doing that, removing auto-renew, changes you to receiving urgent
> email from them once a week or so starting 90 days in advance about
> how your domain is ABOUT TO EXPIRE!
Sort of reminds me of the late night TV ads for ginsu knives
On Jan 22, 2014, at 14:20 , Barry Shein wrote:
> They also will change your domains to "auto renew" magically and punch
> a credit card 90 days in advance of expiry so for example if a domain
> expires in April expect a charge in January at the latest. Why? I
> dunno, better to have the money no
- Original Message -
> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore"
> After the issues with NetSol over the last year, why would anyone keep
> their domains with that registrar?
Better question: are they still the *registry*? And how do stupid policies
like this on the part of one bode for the other?
Ch
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 03:01:03PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Better question: are they still the *registry*?
No, and they haven't been for many years. You're thinking of
Verisign. It owned NetSol at one time, but sold the registrar end
(which is what's still called Network Solutions) in 2003
- Original Message -
> From: "Tim Donahue"
> We ported this to an underlying carrier (the guilty party shall remain
> nameless), and according to their engineers they have no option to
> disable the SSC.
>
> I actually have no idea if the call I am making is blocked at the local
> switch
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Sullivan"
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 03:01:03PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> > Better question: are they still the *registry*?
>
> No, and they haven't been for many years. You're thinking of
> Verisign. It owned NetSol at one time, but sold the regist
Seeing high latency's between LGA and PHL on above.net.. Saw this last
night as well but went away by morning.. Anyone confirm or have any
status?
8 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms ae5.cr1.ord2.us.above.net
[64.125.28.233]
931 ms31 ms31 ms ae6.cr1.lga5.us.above.net [64.125.24
How is this considered even remotely relevant to the NANOG list?
VoiceOps, I can sort of see...
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Tim Donahue"
>
>> We ported this to an underlying carrier (the guilty party shall remain
>> nameless), an
On 1/22/14 10:03 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Brent Simmons is not given to ridiculous overreaction, nor is Lauren.
>
> If you have domains registered with NetSol's registrar, it seems you
> should probably do your diligence on this yourself:
>
> http://inessential.com/2014/01/21/network_solution
Updated:
http://domainnamewire.com/2014/01/22/web-com-weblock-program-will-be-opt-in-not-opt-out/
--quote--
In an interview with Domain Name Wire today, Web.com COO Jason
Teichman said the program will actually be opt-in, and no one will be
charged for the service unless they agree to add it.
“C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
So basically they are charging $1800 for 'Registrar Lock'?
Opt-in or Opt-out, it's still way expensive...
- - ferg
On 1/22/2014 3:49 PM, Jay Farrell wrote:
> Updated:
>
> http://domainnamewire.com/2014/01/22/web-com-weblock-program-will-be-opt-
Sorry. VO correctly doesn't set reply-to, and my MUA, Zimbra, doesn't do
reply-to lisr.
I typed it by hand, and put in the wrong list name.
- jra
Adam Rothschild wrote:
>How is this considered even remotely relevant to the NANOG list?
>
>VoiceOps, I can sort of see...
>
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at
>> No, and they haven't been for many years. You're thinking of
>> Verisign. It owned NetSol at one time, but sold the registrar end
>> (which is what's still called Network Solutions) in 2003.
>
>Well, it's sort of metaphysical to ask which company is which, but...
NetSol and Verisign have been
NetSol: Oops. We goofed.
Why they didn't clarify this when Brent queried them is unclear; I infer
(but cannot, of course, prove) backpedaling.
Cheers,
-- jra
- Forwarded Message -
> From: "PRIVACY Forum mailing list"
> To: privacy-l...@vortex.com
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5
On Jan 17, 2014, at 6:44 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> Jared Mauch wrote:
>>
>> I can point anyone interested to the place in the
>> bind source to force it to reply to all UDP queries with TC=1
>> to force TCP. should be safe on any authority servers, as a recursive
>> server should be able t
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> So basically they are charging $1800 for 'Registrar Lock'?
>
> Opt-in or Opt-out, it's still way expensive...
is it though? is it REALLY??
What's the cost for a lost domain for ~1 day wh
>I suppose they COULD move their domain to a registrar that does
>registrar-lock for 'free', but that's a cost too, right? man power,
>configuration mistakes, other billing things to setup... 1800 might be
>'ok' for someone who's making a bunch of money/day. right?
That is the only plausible reaso
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:19 AM, John Levine wrote:
>>I suppose they COULD move their domain to a registrar that does
>>registrar-lock for 'free', but that's a cost too, right? man power,
>>configuration mistakes, other billing things to setup... 1800 might be
>>'ok' for someone who's making a bu
22 matches
Mail list logo
