On 23 December 2012 01:07, Wayne E Bouchard wrote:
> They serve quite well until I get to a switch that some douchebag
> mounted rear facing on the front posts of the rack
I see this all the time with low-end Cisco ISR products (2... and 3...
routers) since CIsco insist on having a "pretty" pl
On 12/23/12 5:44 AM, Aled Morris wrote:
On 23 December 2012 01:07, Wayne E Bouchard wrote:
They serve quite well until I get to a switch that some douchebag
mounted rear facing on the front posts of the rack
I see this all the time with low-end Cisco ISR products (2... and 3...
routers) si
On 12/23/2012 7:44 AM, Aled Morris wrote:
On 23 December 2012 01:07, Wayne E Bouchard wrote:
They serve quite well until I get to a switch that some douchebag
mounted rear facing on the front posts of the rack
I see this all the time with low-end Cisco ISR products (2... and 3...
routers) s
The "Nonfunctional" side is critical for the LPI obsessed C?O demographic,
and is therefor mandatory for most products.
I wish I didn't know that.
Nick
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> On 12/23/2012 7:44 AM, Aled Morris wrote:
>
>> On 23 December 2012 01:07, Wayne E
Hi folks,
I am seeing an IPv6-connected host on my network (which is on a HE.net
tunnel) apparently being portscanned by an HE server at
2001:470:0:64::2 for about the last hour or so. It is trying to hit
several different ports four times each before moving on and
eventually repeating itse
On 12/23/2012 12:31 AM, Ben Carleton wrote:
Hi folks,
I am seeing an IPv6-connected host on my network (which is on a HE.net
tunnel) apparently being portscanned by an HE server at
2001:470:0:64::2 for about the last hour or so. It is trying to hit
several different ports four times each befo
Can I ask why you count a port scan at something bad?
Or is it just the length of time it has been running for and it re-running
the same scan repetitively?
ฤ๊็๊ ฮ้
ฦ้็้็็
On 23 December 2012 05:31, Ben Carleton wrote:
> Hi
On 12/23/2012 5:23 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 23 December 2012 14:15, Ben Carleton wrote:
On 12/23/2012 12:31 AM, Ben Carleton wrote:
Hi folks,
I am seeing an IPv6-connected host on my network (which is on a HE.net
tunnel) apparently being portscanned by an HE server at 2001:470:0:6
Be aware.. There have been reports of bacon zombies port scanning lately.
>From my Galaxy Note II, please excuse any mistakes.
Original message
From: Bacon Zombie
Date: 12/23/2012 3:20 PM (GMT-07:00)
To:
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Hurricane Electric Tunnelbroker staff?
On 12/19/12 7:02 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2012-12-19 09:53 -0500), Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Perhaps in simpler terms, a CRC error is a localized thing and would
never be forwarded from one device to another.
It would be forwarded in cut-through switching.
I have cut-through switches (arista) that
10 matches
Mail list logo
