On 2012-03-20 16:53 , Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 20/03/2012 14:54, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> For everybody who is "monitoring" other people's websites, please please
>> please, monitor something static like /robots.txt as that can be
>> statically served and is kinda appropriate as it is intended for
Today I received some notices about Hotmail users who couldn't send e-mail
messages to various receipients due to spamfilters blocking them at the
receiving mailservers. Seems like Microsoft/Hotmail staff forgot to set some
reverse DNS pointer records:
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;450 4.7.1 Client host r
Dear All,
is there any open source system you can use to monitor routes and interfaces
availability inside multiple MPLS VRFs
Thanks
thanks guys for your valued information .
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Sherwin Ang wrote:
> I am currently running ASR1006 with ESP20 with 12 full routes and
> routing around 12gig of traffic with no issues.
>
> i guess it would depend on the size of traffic that you will be
> putting i
Yahoo!'s abuse contact from whois:
OrgAbuseEmail: network-ab...@cc.yahoo-inc.com
now sends an autoresponse that tells you to go to a web form to report
spam:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/spam.html
but the link doesn't work--it just redirects to a generic Yahoo! help
page at
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp;450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your
> reverse hostname, [157.55.1.150]
>
> (Verified this using various public DNS servers, to exclude potential
> local
> issues)
>
> Anyone here who has proper contacts to give them the clue-bat?
n...@microsoft.com will proba
I know this tactic isn't exactly new .. just thought I'd pass this along.
Text below is exact with exception of our ARIN information and ranges
(which any of you could figure out anyway).
Cheers,
Michael Holstein
Cleveland State University
--snip--
Description: ABC Widgets
*Greetings, NOC or
Hi!
This was mailed to many ISP's the last days.
Bye,
Raymond.
I know this tactic isn't exactly new .. just thought I'd pass this along.
Text below is exact with exception of our ARIN information and ranges
(which any of you could figure out anyway).
Cheers,
Michael Holstein
Cleveland State
Michael -
We're aware of several parties out there soliciting to 'lease'
your address space, and it appears that most of them are bulk
email operations. Given that the nearly inevitable consequence
is that the blocks in question end up on various anti-spam
blacklists, I imagine tha
Hey All,
I have a site in Alabama that could really use some additional
diversity, but apparently ATT fiber is the only game in town.
If anybody has any options, such as fixed wireless in the 10-50mbs,
please reply to me, off-list.
Best,
Joe
At 21-03-2012 15:29, Jason Gurtz wrote:
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp;450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your
>> reverse hostname, [157.55.1.150]
>>
>> (Verified this using various public DNS servers, to exclude potential
>> local
>> issues)
>>
>> Anyone here who has proper contacts to give the
I don't know about AT&T, but Verizon physically removes the copper connections
when they install fiber into a building. Oddly, this is legal. Verizon is
required to open up their copper to CLECs, but not fiber.
The only option at that point is cable or wireless.
-Original Message-
F
How far? There are a lot of fixed wireless solutions in that space.
Also building your own fiber an option? That distance comes into play as well...
Jared Mauch
On Mar 21, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I have a site in Alabama that could really use some additional diver
> > n...@microsoft.com will probably understand or at least point you in
the
> > right direction.
>
> Yeah, tried that, doesn't work. Same for moc@ and soc@
*sigh* quite the frustrating company... looking in my archives I see also
doma...@microsoft.com which I conversed with late may last year. I
On Wed March 21 2012 10:44, Joe Maimon wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I have a site in Alabama that could really use some additional
> diversity, but apparently ATT fiber is the only game in town.
>
> If anybody has any options, such as fixed wireless in the 10-50mbs,
> please reply to me, off-list.
>
Any
- Original Message -
> From: "Eric Wieling"
> I don't know about AT&T, but Verizon physically removes the copper
> connections when they install fiber into a building. Oddly, this is
> legal. Verizon is required to open up their copper to CLECs, but not
> fiber.
The Verizon *regulated IL
I feel a topic shift coming...
2012/3/21 Jay Ashworth
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Eric Wieling"
>
> > I don't know about AT&T, but Verizon physically removes the copper
> > connections when they install fiber into a building. Oddly, this is
> > legal. Verizon is required to open
You can get Satellite service as well.
It's really expensive, for the bandwidth, but worth a look if you
don't have any other options.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I have a site in Alabama that could really use some additional diversity,
> but apparently ATT
mocal...@microsoft.com
Mention Sev1 in your email.
ryan
On Mar 21, 2012, at 1:54 AM, Michiel Klaver wrote:
> Today I received some notices about Hotmail users who couldn't send e-mail
> messages to various receipients due to spamfilters blocking them at the
> receiving mailservers. Seems li
Verizon, the copper wireline company, is removing service from locations EVERY
TIME VZ fiber is installed in a building. This prevents other companies from
providing service by leasing Verizon's copper infrastructure. If there was
copper at a location then VZ would be required to resell it and
On 3/21/2012 8:44 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Hey All,
I have a site in Alabama that could really use some additional
diversity, but apparently ATT fiber is the only game in town.
If anybody has any options, such as fixed wireless in the 10-50mbs,
please reply to me, off-list.
Best,
Joe
Dependi
Hello,
I have a small project where I could use someone onsite who has general
working cisco knowledge to help transition a site to new isp and make basic
changes in a cisco router.
Of course this was dropped in my lap with short notice so clients wants it
done "asap" which in reality is somethin
I think this highlights a very important aspect of the paid IP address
transfer process - whomever is buying had better perform some due
diligence on the block. These sorts of rent-a-block-for-SPAM activities
are extremely common. Most of the time, they aren't quite this blatant.
- Dan
> -Or
Have a customer that is having problems webbrowsing and need some
offline assistance from someone at Comcast.
First glance, it looks like a proxy/web accelerator problem at Comcast.
Thanks,
Lyle Giese
LCR Computer Services, Inc.
- Original Message -
> From: "Eric Wieling"
> Verizon, the copper wireline company, is removing service from
> locations EVERY TIME VZ fiber is installed in a building. This
> prevents other companies from providing service by leasing Verizon's
> copper infrastructure. If there was copper
On 03/21/2012 11:58 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Wieling"
Verizon, the copper wireline company, is removing service from
locations EVERY TIME VZ fiber is installed in a building. This
prevents other companies from providing service by leasing Verizon's
copper
On 3/21/2012 12:16 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 03/21/2012 11:58 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Wieling"
Verizon, the copper wireline company, is removing service from
locations EVERY TIME VZ fiber is installed in a building. This
prevents other companies fro
On 03/21/2012 12:28 PM, John T. Yocum wrote:
On 3/21/2012 12:16 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 03/21/2012 11:58 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Wieling"
Verizon, the copper wireline company, is removing service from
locations EVERY TIME VZ fiber is installed in
-Original Message-
From: Michael Thomas [mailto:m...@mtcc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:16 PM
To: Jay Ashworth
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Verizon, FiOS, and CLEC/UNE orders (was AT&T diversity)
On 03/21/2012 11:58 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Eri
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Thomas"
> > VZ wants to get rid of their copper plant. It's expensive to
> > maintain, and it requires that they sell service to competitors.
> > Once they've disconnected their customers from it, they can just
> > eliminate the copper plant. POTS ser
On Mar 21, 2012, at 1:54 AM, Michiel Klaver wrote:
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp;450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your
> reverse hostname, [157.55.1.150]
> Anyone here who has proper contacts to give them the clue-bat?
I gather the correct eyes are on the problem and it should be resolved
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:00:32 -0400, Jay Ashworth said:
> Someone tells me off list that indeed, if the plant isn't *there*, VZN
> isn't required to build it.
>
> Now, if that's the case, then they can't adminstratively block *someone
> else* from building it, either...
Yes, but it's assymetric.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>> Verizon, the copper wireline company, is removing service from
>> locations EVERY TIME VZ fiber is installed in a building. This
>> prevents other companies from providing service by leasing Verizon's
>> copper infrastructure. If there was co
- Original Message -
> From: "William Herrin" The hinky part is that the FCC decided that copper pairs are an
> unbundled element but PONS wavelengths and Coaxial cable frequency
> channels are not. So, Verizon doesn't have to share access to FIOS and
> Comcast doesn't have to share access
On 3/21/2012 1:56 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "William Herrin"
The hinky part is that the FCC decided that copper pairs are an
unbundled element but PONS wavelengths and Coaxial cable frequency
channels are not. So, Verizon doesn't have to share access to FIOS
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:00 PM, John T. Yocum
wrote:
> That's probably a local requirement. It's not a Federal requirement. Though,
> some cable companies do provide wholesale services even when not required.
Bingo.
On the flip side of the equation, if you want to be an overbuilder (a
third com
> Bingo.
>
> On the flip side of the equation, if you want to be an overbuilder (a
> third communications infrastructure provider beyond the phone and cable
> companies) the owner of the telephone poles is usually required by the
> state to sell you an "attachment." An attachment is a connection t
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM, John T. Yocum
wrote:
> VZ wants to get rid of their copper plant. It's expensive to maintain, and
As opposed to fiber plant which is indestructible and cheap to maintain?
Well, if VZ owns the copper, if it's not being used to provide a
service, and the price of
My understanding was that fiber loops were originally included in UNE products
available to clecs but several years ago the FCC modified the regulations to
remove them.
So, if a service can be provisioned over a copper loop, a clec can offer it,
but the ilec doesn't have to share fiber loops or
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Michael J Wise wrote:
>
> I gather the correct eyes are on the problem and it should be resolved
> soonest.
> Thanks for the heads-up.
Seems fixed
;; ANSWER SECTION:
150.1.55.157.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN PTR
dub0-omc2-s11.dub0.hotmail.com.
forgetting to set
40 matches
Mail list logo
