Hi Ray,
> prefixes on the same link. Choosing to make use of a 120-bit prefix
> (for example) will do nothing to protect against a rogue RA announcing
> its own 64-bit prefix with the A flag set.
>
I could not find any "A flag" in the RA. Am i missing something?
>From http://www.iana.org/assign
> > prefixes on the same link. Choosing to make use of a 120-bit prefix
> > (for example) will do nothing to protect against a rogue RA announcing
> > its own 64-bit prefix with the A flag set.
> >
>
> I could not find any "A flag" in the RA. Am i missing something?
It's part of the Prefix Infor
I think perhaps you are confusing "what must be supported by
implementations" (and ignoring the text describing the requirements) as
stated in 6434, with operational usage.
For example - SLAAC must be supported by the implementations, but an
environment isn't required to use it.
/TJ
On Dec 24, 2
We host an Ookla Speedtest server onsite and find it a very reliable means
to identify throughput issues. The source of any performance issues may or
may not be ours, but if a customer says things are slow we can usually
identify whether it's their PC or network (browsing is slow but speed test
ru
The MIT article is good read, thanks for sharing that.
One thing to watch out for is if the last mile provider is the one hosting
the speedtest site, that's another variable removed from the equation. In
some cases that is a good thing, in others it's not, depending on what you
are trying to meas
Even though the faq's say they are only good for residential usage, i have
had no problems with it at school. My college has 2x 100 Mb circuits from
TW. When i run speed tests (I use speedtest.net) with the campus empty, i
can get around 95Mb up. The bottleneck is the school's 100Mb switches.
W
Basically it's a CYA statement on the part of Ookla/speedtest.net, since their
test sites are of varying quality. The Radnor, OH test site sometimes can't
even properly test a 10mbit SOHO broadband connection, where the Toledo site is
consistently able to flood every available bit of capacity o
TJ wrote:
> I think perhaps you are confusing "what must be supported by
> implementations" (and ignoring the text describing the requirements) as
> stated in 6434, with operational usage.
There is not much difference.
> For example - SLAAC must be supported by the implementations, but an
> env
8 matches
Mail list logo
