_
From: [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 8:23 AM
To:
Subject: The results of your email commands
The results of your email command are provided below. Attached is your
original message.
- Unprocessed:
move me.
Thanks for the detailed feedback stefan. Its very much appreciated.
I'd also like to say thanks for all the private replies. This will
certainly go a long way in helping us decide who we end up going with.
Best,
On 7/1/10, Stefan Molnar wrote:
>
> XO has many downs than ups. I am a current XO
At the very bottom of each message, you will see
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
If you go there, you can unsubscribe.
Regards
Marshall
On Jul 2, 2010, at 7:24 AM, Scott Amyoony wrote:
_
From: [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org]
S
Thanks for reaching out Brian. We'll certainly keep Saavis in mind and
advise as deemed fit.
Regards,
On 7/1/10, Bellis, Brian wrote:
> Dear Funky Fun,
>
> Have you consider Savvis for IP transit. We are a Tier 1 IP backbone
> provider operating AS-3561. We announce approximately 23% of all
>
On 02/07/2010 13:20, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> At the very bottom of each message, you will see
>
> https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
>
> If you go there, you can unsubscribe.
>
> Regards
> Marshall
>
>
Was it really necessary to quote the entirety of the digest when responding?
B
On 07/02/2010 08:28 AM, William Hamilton wrote:
On 02/07/2010 13:20, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
At the very bottom of each message, you will see
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
If you go there, you can unsubscribe.
Regards
Marshall
Was it really necessary to quote t
On 2 Jul 2010, at 13:34, Bret Clark wrote:
28.8k Modem users...
AT&T iPhone users... the new 14.4 modem of the internet.
On 7/2/2010 07:28, William Hamilton wrote:
> On 02/07/2010 13:20, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>> At the very bottom of each message, you will see
>>
>> https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
>>
>> If you go there, you can unsubscribe.
>>
>> Regards
>> Marshall
>>
>>
>
> Was it really necessa
There are a few people who have some passing interest in ICANN so I
will inflict upon the list my few paragraph summary of things that matter.
All the past large dragons appear to have been killed or reduced to
largish lizards. The Four Over Arching Issues, of which only one was
real, protecti
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, William Herrin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/07/01/finland.broadband/index.html?hpt=T2
In the US, the Communications Act of 1934 brought about the creation
of the "Universal Service Fund." The idea, more or le
Does a "... certain inventor of the Internet ..." refer to the High
Performance and Communications Act of 1991, also known as the "Gore
Act"? The 1991 Act, based on a study by Dr. Leonard Kleinrock ("Towards
a National Research Network") created the commercial Internet that we
know and work with to
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Holmes,David A wrote:
Does a "... certain inventor of the Internet ..." refer to the High
Performance and Communications Act of 1991, also known as the "Gore
Act"? The 1991 Act, based on a study by Dr. Leonard Kleinrock
("Towards
a National Research Network") cre
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:51 13AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Holmes,David A wrote:
>
>> Does a "... certain inventor of the Internet ..." refer to the High
>> Performance and Communications Act of 1991, also known as the "Gore
>> Act"? The 1991 Act, based on a study b
Around 1991 I offered (dial-up) internet to the school district
offices in Boston for $1/month/office, 10 districts, $10/month,
$120/year, shareable accounts. The person from the board of ed I was
talking to said free would be a problem as it might be seen as some
sort of graft etc. and might be c
On 7/2/10 10:00 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
There are a few people who have some passing interest in ICANN so I will
inflict upon the list my few paragraph summary of things that matter.
I thank you! And I'm sure others here do too
The ISPSG (that's the ISP -- Internet.Service.Pro
Does anyone have any pros/cons with using duplex 2-fiber zipcord
jumpers with 2.9mm vs. 2.0mm vs. 1.6mm exterior jacket diameters?
Thanks.
Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
--
-Barry Shein
The World | b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD| Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die| Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *o
Why hasn't Gadi left a comment on the article?
Andrew
- Original Message
From: Randy Bush
To: andrew.wallace
Cc: Jeroen van Aart ; nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, 1 July, 2010 23:01:02
Subject: Re: The Economist, cyber war issue
> There is a part 2 as well
and this is a bug or a feature
> Why hasn't Gadi left a comment on the article?
who gives a damn?
and if he did, i would not see it. and i'm now plonking you.
kiddies!
randy
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Does anyone have any pros/cons with using duplex 2-fiber zipcord
jumpers with 2.9mm vs. 2.0mm vs. 1.6mm exterior jacket diameters?
It really depends on what you need, intended applications, etc.
A thicker jacket will provide a little more protection,
On Friday, July 02, 2010 11:23:21 am Barry Shein wrote:
> The Boston education budget is about $800M today, so maybe it was
> $500M back then? Whatever, hundreds of millions. But they fight over
> the [$120] crumbs!
"If you mind the pennies, the dollars will follow."
Good morning from the West coast,
I have done a fair bit of reading on IPV4/6 co-existence, from what
I have read these two can live together and function totally independent of
one another. I have a large QA environment where they would like DHCPv6
deployed in an environment where all ser
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG and
the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical
We got a strange and out of the blue inquiry from someone
wishing to pay us for a chunk of our ARIN allocation,
> Hello,
>
> According to Whois data, you company owns the following
> IP address space:
>
> 206.220.220.0/24
>
> We would like to get this block of IP addresses for our business
> needs
On 7/2/2010 11:46, Crist Clark wrote:
> We got a strange and out of the blue inquiry from someone
> wishing to pay us for a chunk of our ARIN allocation,
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> According to Whois data, you company owns the following
>> IP address space:
>>
>> 206.220.220.0/24
>>
>> We would like to get
+2 so far here.. Same email, same guy, different netblocks. Spamming
for IP's to spam with?
--heather
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Heather Schiller
Network Security - Verizon Business
1.800.900.0241secur...@verizonbusiness.com
-Original Message-
From: Crist Clar
On Jul 2, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Crist Clark wrote:
> We got a strange and out of the blue inquiry from someone
> wishing to pay us for a chunk of our ARIN allocation,
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> According to Whois data, you company owns the following
>> IP address space:
>>
>> 206.220.220.0/24
>>
>> We wo
Feel free to share the sender's "identity" in case they happen to
actually be a paying customer of any of us on the list...
-Original Message-
From: Schiller, Heather A (HeatherSkanks)
[mailto:heather.schil...@verizonbusiness.com]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:09 PM
To: Crist Clark; Nano
Schiller, Heather A (HeatherSkanks) wrote:
+2 so far here.. Same email, same guy, different netblocks. Spamming
for IP's to spam with?
$5k payable in faked viagra, no doubt.
Mike
On 07/02/2010 01:46 PM, Crist Clark wrote:
We got a strange and out of the blue inquiry from someone
wishing to pay us for a chunk of our ARIN allocation,
Hello,
According to Whois data, you company owns the following
IP address space:
206.220.220.0/24
We would like to get this block of IP a
On 07/02/2010 02:22 PM, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 01:46 PM, Crist Clark wrote:
>> We got a strange and out of the blue inquiry from someone
>> wishing to pay us for a chunk of our ARIN allocation,
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> According to Whois data, you company owns the following
>>> IP
Bingo!
>From an off list response, it looks like this is someone
searching for "memorable" (note the range he inquired about
with us has the repeated 220 octets in the middle) IP
addresses for some project. The email we received was
apparently from the same Sergey Gotsulyak of Ideco sent
this to a
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Oscar Ricardo Silva
wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 01:46 PM, Crist Clark wrote:
>>
>> We got a strange and out of the blue inquiry from someone
>> wishing to pay us for a chunk of our ARIN allocation,
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> According to Whois data, you company owns the follo
On 7/2/2010 12:07, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> They would have to justify their need with ARIN prior to the transfer
> actually taking effect, but, this is now allowed for /22 and shorter
> under NRPM 8.3 (for better or worse).
>
My gut tells me they aren't looking for a transfer. I've been through
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Kevin Stange wrote:
Hello,
According to Whois data, you company owns the following
IP address space:
206.220.220.0/24
146.6.6.0/24
Anyone else notice they seem to be looking for IP blocks where the
middle octets are the same? How could that specific quality be worth $
Maybe APNIC should give him 1.1.1.1 and see how he likes it!
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Jess Kitchen
wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Kevin Stange wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> According to Whois data, you company owns the following
> IP address space:
>
> 206.220.220.0/24
>>
>
I saw a few reports of those today and wrote a short note to forewarn
some other European R&E networks, plus our customers.
http://webmedia.company.ja.net/edlabblogs/developmenteye/2010/07/03/wanted-memorable-24-for-us5k/
Yup, I know the date on the blog is off by one. :)
Cheers,
Rob
Makes one wonder what dead:beef::/32 and c0ff:ee00::/32 will go for? :)
--On Friday, July 02, 2010 9:48 PM +0100 Rob Evans
wrote:
I saw a few reports of those today and wrote a short note to forewarn
some other European R&E networks, plus our customers.
http://webmedia.company.ja.net/edlabb
On 02/07/10 15:21 -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
Makes one wonder what dead:beef::/32 and c0ff:ee00::/32 will go for? :)
Even more off topic:
No match found for cafe:d00d:4:cafe:babe::/32
--
Dan White
Did someone say they had fake viagera?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Loftis [mailto:mlof...@wgops.com]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:21 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Inquiries to Acquire IPs
Makes one wonder what dead:beef::/32 and c0ff:ee00::/32 will go for? :)
--On Friday, Ju
I sent an inquiry in to ARIN yesterday for a certain ASN that was available
and was told that management won't allow them to issue requested numbers. :(
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Dan White [mailto:dwh...@olp.net]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:36 PM
To: Michael Loftis
Cc: nanog@nanog
BGP Update Report
Interval: 24-Jun-10 -to- 01-Jul-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS6298 105080 6.2% 39.2 -- ASN-CXA-PH-6298-CBS - Cox
Communications Inc.
2 - AS9808
This report has been generated at Fri Jul 2 21:11:38 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:40:07PM -0500, Aaron Wendel wrote:
> I sent an inquiry in to ARIN yesterday for a certain ASN that was available
> and was told that management won't allow them to issue requested numbers. :(
That's easy, then... "Can I have any of ASN 0 to $DESIRED-1 or $DESIRED+1 to
65
Hello All,
Anyone out there willing to entertain a few career advice-related questions
off list? Nothing too deep, I promise, just a little advice from those of
you who have been in the industry a bit longer than I have?
Thanks for any and all assistance, and have a great weekend.
Here in the New York Metro, XO's collocation offering is pretty solid.
No frills, but competently managed, and offered under a reasonable
pricing model for retail collocation.
I've had similarly positive experiences with their transport side of
the house. I've not looked at the IP product...
I c
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:51 13AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Holmes,David A wrote:
Does a "... certain inventor of the Internet ..." refer to the High
Performance and Communications Act of 1991, also known as the "Gore
Act"? The
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Crist Clark wrote:
An interesting if disturbing thing to see... I suppose there is a
possibility that some IP address speculator is trying to er, acquire
interesting /24s in anticipation of RIR address exhaustion.
I have doubts that an uns
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Adam Rothschild
> wrote:
> Here in the New York Metro, XO's collocation offering is pretty solid.
> No frills, but competently managed, and offered under a reasonable
> pricing model for retail collocation.
>
> I've had similarly positive experiences with their tra
49 matches
Mail list logo
