Maybe he has the power to switch it off
- but only cn-nic has the power to reboot the hardware
they sold us :)
I am glad AX25 and AMPR.ORG even work without tcp/ip and IPv6
and they will continue to do even on solar power and batteries.
Don't ever ask me to take my antennas down again.
Cheer
On 6/17/2010 9:07 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> For those that missed the presentation, it was a real eye-opener on just
> how important it is for you to move forward with IPv6 before something like
> this actually starts getting implemented.
>
> Owen
+1
Frank
Hi
We (a small ISP in the middle of nowhere) are having problems
resolving DNSsec records from godaddy.
This commands works just fine
# dig @ns52.domaincontrol.com loomus.com
but this doesn't
# dig @ns52.domaincontrol.com +dnssec loomus.com
We don't receive the reply to the query.
and no, this
In message , MKS
writes:
> Hi
>
> We (a small ISP in the middle of nowhere) are having problems
> resolving DNSsec records from godaddy.
>
> This commands works just fine
> # dig @ns52.domaincontrol.com loomus.com
>
> but this doesn't
> # dig @ns52.domaincontrol.com +dnssec loomus.com
> We don
On 2010.06.17 17:10, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Roy wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 7:43 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>>> With a larger
>>> network, multiple IP blocks, ***numerous multihomed customers***, some of
>>> which
>>> use IP's we've assigned them, it gets a little more co
Once upon a time, Steve Bertrand said:
> If all IP blocks are tied down to null, and urpf is enabled in loose
> mode on an interface, it will catch cases where someone is sourcing
> traffic to you using IPs from the unassigned space that you have in your
> free pools.
That's not true on JUNOS dev
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.06.17 17:10, William Herrin wrote:
>> Reverse path filtering + asymmetric routing = epic fail. Jon did say
>> Multihomed customer.
>
> If all IP blocks are tied down to null, and urpf is enabled in loose
> mode on an interface, it wi
On 2010.06.18 09:06, William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> If all IP blocks are tied down to null, and urpf is enabled in loose
>> mode on an interface, it will catch cases where someone is sourcing
>> traffic to you using IPs from the unassigned space
On 2010.06.18 08:49, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Steve Bertrand said:
>> If all IP blocks are tied down to null, and urpf is enabled in loose
>> mode on an interface, it will catch cases where someone is sourcing
>> traffic to you using IPs from the unassigned space that you have in you
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.06.18 09:06, William Herrin wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure what that accomplishes. It doesn't close any doors. With
>> loose-mode RPF he can still forge packets from any address ac
Does anyone have any experience with the Dell PowerConnect 8024F 10-gig
switch that they'd be willing to share? How does it perform? How reliable
is it? My experiences with the Dell switches have been less than favorable
to this point, but I am willing to concede that some of that may be colored
With marketing campaigns like these, no consumer will want to use IPv6, if it
becomes associated with privacy problems.
http://torrentfreak.com/huge-security-flaw-makes-vpns-useless-for-bittorrent-100617/
It is, of course, totally irrelevant whether the reporting is factually correct
or even ba
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:57 -0400, Steven Fischer wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with the Dell PowerConnect 8024F 10-gig
> switch that they'd be willing to share? How does it perform? How reliable
> is it? My experiences with the Dell switches have been less than favorable
> to th
On Jun 18, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Zed Usser wrote:
> With marketing campaigns like these, no consumer will want to use IPv6, if it
> becomes associated with privacy problems.
>
> http://torrentfreak.com/huge-security-flaw-makes-vpns-useless-for-bittorrent-100617/
>
> It is, of course, totally irre
On 18 jun 2010, at 18:04, Zed Usser wrote:
> With marketing campaigns like these, no consumer will want to use IPv6, if it
> becomes associated with privacy problems.
>
> http://torrentfreak.com/huge-security-flaw-makes-vpns-useless-for-bittorrent-100617/
>
> It is, of course, totally irreleva
This is not exactly true.
With the 3G networks (GSM) you can get.
7.2-Mbps HSDPA (downstream)
5.8-Mbps HSUPA (upstream)
LTE speeds are much more comparable to Wimax.
-Original Message-
From: Holmes,David A [mailto:dhol...@mwdh2o.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:16 AM
To: Seth Mat
I'd really like to talk to the guy who presented this. Does anyone happen to
have a contact for him? Feel free to send it privately if you do.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Marco Hogewoning [mailto:mar...@marcoh.net]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 10:48 AM
To: na...@merit.edu
Subject: Re
On 17/06/10 20:02, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> The main problem with HP switches and their 'free software upgrades'
> is that there are regularly bugs and regressions in the software and
> their solution is to have you 'oh just update the software'... this
> is not always practical in a production envi
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .
Routing
> -Original Message-
> From: Todd Underwood [mailto:toddun...@gmail.com]
>
> firstly: cgn puts reachability in the hands of a single organization.
> with the PAP System you have a set of distributed choices about
> reachability: different people can assess their different tolerance
> to
Root Zone DNSSEC Deployment
Technical Status Update 2010-06-18
This is the ninth of a series of technical status updates intended
to inform a technical audience on progress in signing the root zone
of the DNS.
RESOURCES
Details of the project, including documentation published to date,
can be f
look like like they are trying to squeeze both ends.
http://www.crn.com/networking/225700593;jsessionid=IR3YB1SGLW2BHQE1GHPSKH4ATMY32JVN
On 18/07/10 1:25 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 6/18/2010 00:16, Tom Wright wrote:
What ever happened to this?
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3271.txt
Ok here we go. I know the subject is a little ambiguous, please allow to
explain.
I have a network of 192.168.1.0/24 and I need it to reach a network 10.0.1.0/27
only when it needs to be accessed by specific machines that reside on the
192.168.1.0/24 network.
192.168.1.10 à NAT à10
Do you mean you want certain addresses on /24 to NAT out to /27, but not all
of them? Sounds like and ACL will do:
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-1039094.html
-ak
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Mike Ruiz wrote:
> Ok here we go. I know the subject is a little ambiguous,
> 192.168.1.10 à NAT à10.0.1.10 à route that packet to 10.0.1.1.
>
>
>
> I only want specific host to route to that specific /27 network .
>
Cisco's route-map can do this (policy based routing .. define an ACL to
match and then route accordingly) :
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/t
Also this 192.168.1.0/24 needs to have access to my other prefixes. It only
needs to NAT'd when it needs to connect to that specific network.
From: Andrey Khomyakov [mailto:khomyakov.and...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 3:25 PM
To: Mike Ruiz
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re:
Do
> Dell switches are usually Foundry gear relabeled, so it should be ok.
> We are using Dell switches alongside actual Foundry gear in a cloud
> environment and have had no problems.
Maybe I haven't looked recently enough, but that wasn't quite the way
it worked last time I checked.
For example, A
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Tom Wright wrote:
> What ever happened to this?
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3271.txt
>
> -- Tom
Unfortunately, I think Vint was a little optimistic there, and failed
to guess at the impact the financial collapse was going to have
on our rate of innovation and
Anyone have any recommendations on a DC rectifier shelf? Been looking
at Valere but the lead time is 4-6 weeks (which is too long).
Thanks.
Ric.
On 6/18/2010 13:55, Joe Greco wrote:
>> Dell switches are usually Foundry gear relabeled, so it should be ok.
>> We are using Dell switches alongside actual Foundry gear in a cloud
>> environment and have had no problems.
>
> Maybe I haven't looked recently enough, but that wasn't quite the way
>
> There's also another factor: you may not have any idea whose rebranded
> switch you're getting when you buy a Dell switch. Maybe it's Foundry in
> batch X, but it might not be in batch Y.
Is there any evidence that this happens within a model? I find it
hard to believe. I can see differences
BGP Update Report
Interval: 10-Jun-10 -to- 17-Jun-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS18910 56844 4.0%3552.8 -- BIG-SANDY-BROADBAND-INC - Big
Sandy Broadband Inc
2 - AS308
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 18 21:11:45 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
On 6/18/10 2:21 PM, "Matthew Petach" wrote:
> He also seemed to miss one of the really, REALLY important points;
> if "Internet is for everyone" were really true, then IPv6 adoption should
> have been one of his driving points. After all with a world population of
> 7 billion, you certainly can
On 2010-06-18 10:49, Akyol, Bora A wrote:
This is not exactly true.
With the 3G networks (GSM) you can get.
7.2-Mbps HSDPA (downstream)
5.8-Mbps HSUPA (upstream)
3gpp rel7 hsdpa/hsupa goes about 4 fold faster than that down and twice
as fast up without having to resort to mimo.
whether any
OK, I'll throw in my $.02,
It really doesn't matter what any of us say, anecdotes from NANOG will not
stop your CEO/CFO or worse your CMO from directing you to use HP.
You have only two choices. The first is to engage in "war of the PowerPoints"
during which you and the HP account team inform "th
36 matches
Mail list logo
