Hi everyone,
I am curious regarding the use of "policies", rules or goals to manage a
network at the three levels: business, traffic engineering and routing. I
have these questions:
1) What examples of policies could be enforced at each level? (the simplest
case being that of routing policies usi
Owen DeLong writes:
>> denial
>> anger
>> bargaining
>> depression
> acceptance<--- My dual-stacked network and I are here.
So am I. But most IT people I talk to are still at the denial phase. And
there is not much one can do about it.
Jens, 566 days to go
--
-
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:55, Jens Link wrote:
> Owen DeLong writes:
>
>>> denial
>>> anger
>>> bargaining
>>> depression
>> acceptance <--- My dual-stacked network and I are here.
>
> So am I. But most IT people I talk to are still at the denial phase. And
> there is not much one can do abou
Isn't that just CYA? Thank the lawyers and "corporate compliance
offices" and professional whiners.
Scott
John Peach wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:00:45 -0500
Tim Sanderson [1] wrote:
[snip]
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
> Isn't that just CYA? Thank the lawyers and "corporate compliance
>offices" and professional whiners.
The obvious answer is that if your corporate email policy makes you look like
an idiot, post to mailing lists from a personal email address that doesn't make
you look like an idiot.
This
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 14:09:18 Tim Franklin wrote:
> > Isn't that just CYA? Thank the lawyers and "corporate compliance
> >offices" and professional whiners.
>
> The obvious answer is that if your corporate email policy makes you look
> like an idiot, post to mailing lists from a person
The issue occurred during preventative maintenance of one of our data centers
when a human error caused an electrical overload on the systems. This caused
Cisco.com and other applications to go down. Because of the severity of the
overload, the redundancy measures in some of the applications a
On Mar 10, 2010, at 2:55 AM, Jens Link wrote:
> Owen DeLong writes:
>
>>> denial
>>> anger
>>> bargaining
>>> depression
>> acceptance<--- My dual-stacked network and I are here.
>
> So am I. But most IT people I talk to are still at the denial phase. And
True
> there is not much one can
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Gregory Hicks wrote:
> The press release at
> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html states that the
> pricing for the CRS-3 STARTS AT $90K...
Is that the cost for a nameplate you can stick on an empty rack with
dark glass so you can fool people vis
Cisco and linerate...if it would be a Juniper I could say OK, on a Cisco, first
see then believe.
Also, seeing CRS-1's, is the '3' in CRS-3 the multiplier or magnitude of
problems to be expected compared to its 'little' buggy sister.. ? :)
-Original Message-
From: Bob Snyder [mailto:rs
JUNIPER Networks did a press note about the new T-1600 components:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/press-releases/2010/pr_2010_02_04-08_30.html
And now CISCO with the new components for the CRS-1 ... to increase it
to "new" CRS-3.
Both companies looks like want to reach 4 Tbps
JUNIPER Networks did a press note about the new T-1600 components:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/press-releases/2010/pr_2010_02_04-08_30.html
And now CISCO with the new components for the CRS-1 ... to increase it
to "new" CRS-3.
T1600 - 250 Gbps full duplex / slot
CRS-3 - 120
I am looking for MPLS L2 VPN that will let give a ethernet port in
springfield, MA @ one federal TO Wellington, NZ @ AT&T House. Can anyone
here do this? Also can you provide me with some ball park pricing.
Please reply off list.
--
James Jones
+1-413-667-9199
ja...@freedomnet.co.nz
Does anyone have a list of carriers who are IPv6 capable today?
I would assume this would be rolled out in larger cities first but
anything outside of "testbed environments" and "trials" as in
Comcast's recent announcement seems to be all that is available.
I'm being tasked with coming up with an
On 3/10/10 11:00 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Does anyone have a list of carriers who are IPv6 capable today?
>
> I would assume this would be rolled out in larger cities first but
> anything outside of "testbed environments" and "trials" as in
> Comcast's recent announcement seems to be all that is
On Mar 10, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Does anyone have a list of carriers who are IPv6 capable today?
>
> I would assume this would be rolled out in larger cities first but
> anything outside of "testbed environments" and "trials" as in
> Comcast's recent announcement seems to be a
SixXS maintains a list here:
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=ipv6transit.
The IPv6 BGP weather map is a good resource:
http://bgpmon.net/weathermap.php?inet=6
You can also use Geoff Huston's IPv6 CIDR report:
http://www.cidr-report.org/v6/as2.0/
I should also note that my employer, tw t
> -Original Message-
> From: Seth Mattinen
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:19 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?
>
>
> VZB - yes, good luck
>
> ... Not all of Verizon's pops are IPv6
> enabled, which may cause you trouble ordering it.
> ~Seth
Recent
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Bob Snyder wrote:
Linecards are interesting. We get a 100Gb card, we get a linerate
14-port 10Gb card, but apparently there's still only a single port
OC-768 40Gb card.
There has been claims that volume for OC-768 is low so no major effort has
been seen to reduce OC-768
We have a dual-stack 10G link to XO here in Seattle so they are doing it
as well... Savvis is not doing v6 yet either so far as I know, we are
going to make that an issue at our next renewal.I am told that
level3 is working on a full dual-stack roll-out currently and that it
should be availab
We are getting native IPv6 from HE and Qwest at this time. Qwest was
doing a beta of IPv6 that we were (are) a part of. Not sure of they
have ended the beta and rolled out to production.
Chris Gotstein, Sr Network Engineer, UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
http://uplogon.com |
Le mercredi 10 mars 2010 à 11:18 -0800, Seth Mattinen a écrit :
> On 3/10/10 11:00 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> > Does anyone have a list of carriers who are IPv6 capable today?
> >
> > I would assume this would be rolled out in larger cities first but
> > anything outside of "testbed environments"
On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Does anyone have a list of carriers who are IPv6 capable today?
>
> I would assume this would be rolled out in larger cities first but
> anything outside of "testbed environments" and "trials" as in
> Comcast's recent announcement seems to be
Can anyone recommend a cheap Ethernet to Serial (RS232/422/485)
converter with functionality like the Lantronix boxes .. except one that
supports access lists (nothing complicated .. maybe a list of 5 approved
hosts). I need a bunch of single port devices, not an access-server for
a rack.
I could
It looks like Comcast offers IPv6 today. Check the below link out to see
if your data center is near any of their POP's. I believe Comcast's trials
are for their Docsis products.
http://www.comcast.com/dedicatedinternet/default.html
On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Michael Holstein wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a cheap Ethernet to Serial (RS232/422/485)
> converter with functionality like the Lantronix boxes .. except one that
> supports access lists (nothing complicated .. maybe a list of 5 approved
> hosts). I need a bunch of
>Message: 13
>Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:18:35 -0800
>From: Seth Mattinen
>Subject: Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?
>To: nanog@nanog.org
>Message-ID: <4b97f08b.2070...@rollernet.us>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>On 3/10/10 11:00 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
>> Does anyone have a list of carrier
Owen DeLong wrote:
[..]
> Hurricane Electric has a full production dual-stack environment.
>
>> I'm being tasked with coming up with an IPv6 migration plan for a data
>> center.
>>
>> Mostly interested in if ATT, Level3, GLBX, Saavis, Verizon Business
>> and Qwest are capable as those are the typ
Colleagues,
This is a technical, operational announcement regarding changes to the ARPA
top-level domain. Apologies in advance for duplicates received through
different mailing lists.
No specific action is requested of operators. This message is for your
information only.
The ARPA zone is abo
I'm searching for a switch with at least one 10Gbase-T ethernet port
and some gigabit ethernet for lab test.
>From cisco web site i've seen for example a 3560 model with X2 module
and CX4 port but nothing with 10Gb-T.
Unfortunately my budget couldn't arrive to nexus or cat6500
Do you have som
You might look at Juniper EX3200 with a EX-UM-2XFP and then optics of your
choice (EX-XFP-10GE-SR)
-b
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Mirko Maffioli wrote:
> I'm searching for a switch with at least one 10Gbase-T ethernet port
> and some gigabit ethernet for lab test.
> >From cisco web site i'v
Hi All,
I need a wireless bridge solution that allows to pass jumbo frames over a
distance of 3 miles, using the 5.8 GHz band. The original solution was a
Proxim Tsunami GX 200, but unfortunately it doesn't go beyond an MTU of 1536
bytes: we need at least 1544 bytes, ideally between 4470 and 9212
Check out DragonWave:
http://www.dragonwaveinc.com/
-Mike
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Stefano Gridelli wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I need a wireless bridge solution that allows to pass jumbo frames over a
> distance of 3 miles, using the 5.8 GHz band. The original solution was a
> Proxim Tsunam
Owen DeLong writes:
> I spend much of my time talking to groups of people about this. I
> have managed to get several members of such groups from denial to
> bargaining and sometimes eve depression in a single session.
I did several presentations about IPv6 basics myself and there was very
posi
The Dragonwave would be my first choice too, but they are not in the 5.8GHz
band.
The Motorola PTP-600 has a 2000 byte MTU, but doesn't do multimode handoff.
What radio to get will come down to what you are willing to give up -- if
you are willing to drop the 5.8Ghz band and go with 11Ghz then th
On Mar 10, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Jens Link wrote:
> Owen DeLong writes:
>
>> I spend much of my time talking to groups of people about this. I
>> have managed to get several members of such groups from denial to
>> bargaining and sometimes eve depression in a single session.
>
> I did several pre
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Mirko Maffioli wrote:
> I'm searching for a switch with at least one 10Gbase-T ethernet port
> and some gigabit ethernet for lab test.
We're looking at Arista for this kind of config
http://www.aristanetworks.com/en/products/7100t
On 3/10/2010 05:06, Andy Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:55, Jens Link wrote:
>
>> Owen DeLong writes:
>>
>>
denial
anger
bargaining
depression
>>> acceptance<--- My dual-stacked network and I are here.
>>>
>> So am I. But most IT peop
IMHO, only personally experienced pain is going to push a lot of these
sorts of people into ipv6. By pain, I mean things such as not being
able to deploy their new service (web site, email server, VPN box,
whatever) on the internet due to lack of ipv4 addresses, having to
implement double NAT, C
arista 7120t-4s...
On 03/10/2010 02:04 PM, Bill Blackford wrote:
> You might look at Juniper EX3200 with a EX-UM-2XFP and then optics of your
> choice (EX-XFP-10GE-SR)
>
> -b
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Mirko Maffioli
> wrote:
>
>> I'm searching for a switch with at least one 10Gbase-
On 3/10/2010 16:57, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>> IMHO, only personally experienced pain is going to push a lot of these
>> sorts of people into ipv6. By pain, I mean things such as not being
>> able to deploy their new service (web site, email server, VPN box,
>> whatever) on the internet due to lack
Well, it's like this... there's still no native IPv6 connectivity in most data
centers, residences, businesses or wireless, most vendors of networking
equipment have not had a lot of mileage on their IPv6 code if they even have it
fully working, and, frankly, the IPv6 community has been predicti
>On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Michael Holstein wrote:
>> Can anyone recommend a cheap Ethernet to Serial (RS232/422/485)
>> converter with functionality like the Lantronix boxes .. except one
that
>> supports access lists (nothing complicated .. maybe a list of 5
approved
>> hosts). I need a bunc
> arista 7120t-4s...
hot box. but you are giving away the secret sauce!
randy
Did anyone notice any issues with Qwest DNS the past hour or two? We've had
users with intermittent issues and the weird thing is while they can't
resolve certain domains within Qwest's network I can query the same DNS
servers from outside of Qwest's network and the names resolve just fine.
Dan
On 3/10/2010 9:40 PM, Daniel wrote:
> Did anyone notice any issues with Qwest DNS the past hour or two? We've had
> users with intermittent issues and the weird thing is while they can't
> resolve certain domains within Qwest's network I can query the same DNS
> servers from outside of Qwest's netw
I have to agree the Arista is a great box at a great price
(comparatively). I was really impressed with the performance in our
testing for top of rack switches.
The Juniper EX3200 with 10GigE uplink card works really well too but you
are limited to 2x10GE ports per switch. We have a couple of th
Avocent / Cyclades boxes have ACL capability (they run Linux) and can
be used with EV-DO/GSM modems. They may not be the lowest cost
solution, but there is a central management system and a wide range of
serial interface units from single port to at least 32 ports.
Jon
Full disclosure: I was a mem
What would be there cost in qty of hundreds?
Thanks
Uri
Instead of the PTP600, you might try looking at the PTP800. Again,
not 5.8 GHz but does up to 368 Mbps full duplex over the air
interface, jumbo frames up to 9600 bytes, AES 128 or 256 bit
encryption, 11, 18, 23, or 26 GHz depending on what regulatory agency
you fall under. Will do fiber
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:26:16 +0900
> From: Randy Bush
>
> > arista 7120t-4s...
>
> hot box. but you are giving away the secret sauce!
Hot box for the datacenter, but small buffers make it unsuited for
long distances. In the right place, this box can't be beaten in the
price/performance re
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Chris Grundemann wrote:
SixXS maintains a list here:
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=ipv6transit.
I think that list should also include TeliaSonera. TSIC does offer v6
transit, although their product sheet only mentions IPv4.
--
Pekka Savola "Y
We've used mikrotik routerboards that support ev-do as wireless serial
adapters..It is only good for a single port application.. but it
works.. and at a price of $99..
it would certainly support access lists.. we have them dial back to a pptp
concentrator...just a thought..
>
> -
53 matches
Mail list logo
