I hate to do this but I have been unable to get anyone at cox.net to
respond. No answer from postmaster after weeks of trying.
If there is a cox.net contact on the list, I would be extremely grateful if
you could put me in contact with a cox.net mail admin. Email to our
customers is accepted by th
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I have tried repeatedly by private email directly to Verizon and I have
contacted an ex-UUnet employee, but so far, it would appear that Verizon
is running an unattended and unmaintained "spam reporting" system with
emails like this:
For questions about these reports pl
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:50:24PM -0700, virendra rode // wrote:
Wiki would serve well for documentation purposes such as operational,
ISP related such as peer relationships, isp contacts, tools, etc., but
nothing comes close to real-time outages (user feedback) via e-mai
Something going on with SpamHaus site/ dnsbl servers?
spamhaus.org1 SOA
server: need.to.know.only 259200s
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
serial: 2008060901
refresh:3600
retry: 600
expire:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:53:54AM -0700, Jeff Shultz wrote:
> Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:50:24PM -0700, virendra rode // wrote:
> >>Wiki would serve well for documentation purposes such as operational,
> >>ISP related such as peer relationships, isp contacts, tools, etc.,
hello gentleman
sorry for my offtopic response, but i got a lot of spam in the past
days from a fake email at delphi.com
there is no email at the delphi.com and the sender seems to be from
an dynamic dsl account
it changes from different countrys .ar /co /pl
is there a way to get rid of it
Hi,
I'm looking for input on the best practices for sending large files over
a long fat pipe between facilities (gigabit private circuit, ~20ms RTT).
I'd like to avoid modifying TCP windows and options on end hosts where
possible (I have a lot of them). I've seen products that work as
"transfe
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:37:47 -0700
> From: Sean Knox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for input on the best practices for sending large files over
> a long fat pipe between facilities (gigabit private circuit, ~20ms RTT).
> I'd like to avoid modifying TCP windows and options on e
At 06:37 PM 6/12/2008, you wrote:
I'm looking for input on the best practices for sending large files
over a long fat pipe between facilities (gigabit private circuit, ~20ms RTT).
I'd like to avoid modifying TCP windows and options on end hosts
where possible (I have a lot of them). I've seen pr
> The idea is to use tuned proxies that are close to the source and
> destination and are optimized for the delay. Local systems can move data
> through them without dealing with the need to tune for the
> delay-bandwidth product. Note that this "man in the middle" may not
> play well with many sec
Take a look at some of the stuff from Aspera.
Mark
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 03:37:47PM -0700, Sean Knox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for input on the best practices for sending large files over
> a long fat pipe between facilities (gigabit private circuit, ~20ms RTT).
> I'd like to avoid modify
Karl Auerbach wrote:
> Randy Bush wrote:
>> and for those of us who are addicted to simple rsync, or whatever over
>> ssh, you should be aware of the really bad openssh windowing issue.
> I was not aware of this. Do you have a pointer to a description?
see the work by rapier and stevens at psc
And while I certainly like open source solutions, there are plenty of
commercial products that do things to optimize this. Depending on the type
of traffic the products do different things. Many of the serial-byte
caching variety (e.g. Riverbed/F5) now also do connection/flow optimization
and pro
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for input on the best practices for sending large
> files
There are both commercial products (fastcopy)
and various "free"(*) products (bbcp, bbftp,
gridftp) that will send large files. While
they can take advantage of larger windows
they also have the capability of using
> I'm looking for input on the best practices for sending large files over
> a long fat pipe between facilities (gigabit private circuit, ~20ms RTT).
providing you have RFC1323 type extensions enabled on a semi-decent OS, a 4MB
TCP window should be more than sufficient to fill a GbE pipe over 30m
Does anybody heard if comcast is having problems today?
Thank you,
Taeko
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:02:52PM -0700, Thompson, Taeko wrote:
> Does anybody heard if comcast is having problems today?
Since I got on shift two hours ago, I've done nothing but stare at
traceroutes into and out of Comcast space trying to reassure dozens of
customers that we're not down, Comcas
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and for those of us who are addicted to simple rsync, or whatever over
> ssh, you should be aware of the really bad openssh windowing issue.
As a user of hpn-ssh for years, I have to wonder if there is any
reason (aside from the sheer cussedness for which
> Does anybody heard if comcast is having problems today?
lucy was having problems in eugene orygun. she diagnosed and then gave
up and went to dinner.
randy
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Randy Bush wrote:
Does anybody heard if comcast is having problems today?
lucy was having problems in eugene orygun. she diagnosed and then gave
up and went to dinner.
randy
I have a comcast business line in Western WA and have seen no hiccups
so far today. Main IP is
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Thompson, Taeko wrote:
Does anybody heard if comcast is having problems today?
I've got a customer in 73.72.92.0/24, and I don't see the prefix on the
net.
Just to confirm from here (Toronto):
core2-rtr-to#sh ip bgp 73.72.92.0
% Network not in table
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 9:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: comcast
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Thompson, Taeko wrote:
> Does
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> >> Does anybody heard if comcast is having problems today?
> >
> > lucy was having problems in eugene orygun. she diagnosed
> and then gave
> > up and went to dinner.
> >
> > randy
> >
>
> I have a comcast business line in Western WA and have seen no
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:02:31 +0900
> From: Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > The idea is to use tuned proxies that are close to the source and
> > destination and are optimized for the delay. Local systems can move data
> > through them without dealing with the need to tune for the
> > del
Tom,
Where would that be located. From my house my UUNet/MCI/Verizon Business
Link doesn't have it. My speakeasy link doesn't have it either. All of
Comcast was out in my neighborhood (Alexandria, VA) yesterday at 7pm when I
got home, was still out at 11pm when I went to bed, up and running fine th
when was the last time you saw this prefix reachable?
i dont see anything announced from comcasts 73.0.0.0/8 allocation within the
past 2 weeks...
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Thompson, Taeko wrote:
>
>> Does anybody heard if comcast is
> From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:15:49 -0400
>
>
> Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > and for those of us who are addicted to simple rsync, or whatever over
> > ssh, you should be aware of the really bad openssh windowing issue.
>
> As a use
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when was the last time you saw this prefix reachable?
>
> i dont see anything announced from comcasts 73.0.0.0/8 allocation within the
> past 2 weeks...
FYI: Internally within Comcast it does route:
$ mtr --report -c 1 73.0.
interesting enough mine goes the other way
brokenrobot:~ christian$ traceroute 73.72.92.1
traceroute to 73.72.92.1 (73.72.92.1), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 192.168.2.1 (192.168.2.1) 12.130 ms 1.135 ms 1.262 ms
2 * * *
3 ge-2-3-ur01.jerseycity.nj.panjde.comcast.net (68.86.220.185) 10.
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:01:03 -0400
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> > >> Does anybody heard if comcast is having problems today?
> > >
> > > lucy was having problems in eugene orygun. she diagnosed
> > and then gave
> > > up and went to dinner.
> > >
>
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:02:52 -0700
"Thompson, Taeko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
They've been fine in my area (atlanta), though there was a fair bit of
downtime last week. I did, however, notice today that my port 25 blocks
are gone... which wasn't the case last week.
>
> Does anybody heard if c
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Jim Popovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 18. po-10-ur01.burlington.nj.pan 0.0% 1 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 0.0
23 114 ms 122 ms 113 ms ge-0-1-ubr02.pittsburg.ca.sfba.comcast.net [68.8
7.197.22]
Für eine Weile hatten wir Zugang durch eine Hong Ko
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Martin Hannigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Jim Popovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 18. po-10-ur01.burlington.nj.pan 0.0% 1 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 0.0
>
> 23 114 ms 122 ms 113 ms ge-0-1-ubr02.pittsburg.ca.s
Hi Sean,
from thursday, we have copied some ~300 GB packages from Prague to San
Diego (~200 ms delay, 10 GE flat ethernet end machines connected via
1GE) files using RBUDP which worked great.
Each scenario needs some planning. You have to answer several questions:
1) What is the performance of
34 matches
Mail list logo
