[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Gibbard) writes:
> On Sat, 3 May 2008, Mike Lewinski wrote:
>
> > David Coulson wrote:
> >> Depends - It doesn't help if the DNS server is dead, but the front-end
> >> is still advertising the routes.
> >
> > Possibly a good argument for allowing the DNS servers to origin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Ward) writes:
> > That also doesn't take into account how many /8's are being hoarded by
> > organizations that don't need even 25% of that space.
>
> Unless you're expecting those organisations to be really nice and make
> that address space available to other organis
I'm not sure that I would tar everyone who does NXDOMAIN remapping with
the same brush as SPAM and DDOS. Handled the way OpenDNS does, on an
opt-in basis, it's a "good thing" IMO.
I would also say that disaggregating and remarketing dark address space,
assuming it's handled above board and in a wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
We are on the final stages of getting the host operational that has
taken longer than we expected. This was a combination of application /
hardware related issue that caused a prolonged outage.
We deeply regret the delay and we should have outage
> I'm not sure that I would tar everyone who does NXDOMAIN remapping with
> the same brush as SPAM and DDOS. Handled the way OpenDNS does, on an
> opt-in basis, it's a "good thing" IMO.
i agree, and i'm on record as saying that since opendns doesn't affect the
people who do not knowingly sign up f
Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
> IPv4 has enough addresses for every computer on Earth, and then some.
There are approximately 3.4 billion or a little less usable ip
addresses. there are 3.3 billion mobile phone users buying approximately
400,000 ip capable devices a day. That's a single industy,
notw
Please consider to contribute to and/or forward to the appropriate groups the
following opportunity to submit and publish original scientific results.
Apologies for cross-postings.
== UBICOMM 2008 Call for Papers ===
CALL FOR PAPERS, TUTORIALS, PANELS
UBICOMM 2008, The
Please consider to contribute to and/or forward to the appropriate groups the
following opportunity to submit and publish original scientific results.
Apologies for cross-postings.
== UBICOMM 2008 Call for Papers ===
CALL FOR PAPERS, TUTORIALS, PANELS
UBICOMM 2008, The
evening all ,
found an related article about the power consumtion saving in ip6.
-
Up to 300 Megawatt Worth of Keepalive Messages to be Saved by IPv6?
http://www.circleid.com/posts/81072_megawatts_keepalive_ipv6/
http://www.niksula.hut.fi/~peronen/publications/haverinen_siren_eronen_vtc2007.
On Mon, May 05, 2008, Marc Manthey wrote:
> evening all ,
>
> found an related article about the power consumtion saving in ip6.
>
> -
>
> Up to 300 Megawatt Worth of Keepalive Messages to be Saved by IPv6?
>
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/81072_megawatts_keepalive_ipv6/
>
> http://www.niks
Notwithstanding that fact that keepalives are a huge issue for tiny
battery powered devices. There's a false economy in assuming those
packets wouldn't have to be sent with IPV6...
Marc Manthey wrote:
> evening all ,
>
> found an related article about the power consumtion saving in ip6.
>
> found an related article about the power consumtion saving in ip6.
no, you found an article about bad nat design in a market lacking the
ability to stanardize on a clean one.
if you look, you can also find statements by the same folk explaining
how ipv6 will help prevent car accidents involvi
> but if the bottom feeding scumsuckers who saw the opportunity now known as
> spam, or the ones who saw the opportunity now known as NXDOMAIN remapping,
> or the ones who saw the opportunity now known as DDoS for hire, realize that
> the next great weakness in the internet's design and protocols i
On May 3, 2008, at 8:37 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> William Warren wrote:
>> That also doesn't take into account how many /8's are being hoarded
>> by
>> organizations that don't need even 25% of that space.
> which one's would those be?
While I wouldn't call it hoarding, can any single (non-ISP)
On May 4, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
> The artifact of MIT and others
> having /8s while the entire Indian subcontinent scrapes for /29s, can
> hardly be considered optimal or right.
While perhaps intended as hyperbole, this sort of statement annoys me
as it demonstrates an ignora
On May 4, 2008, at 11:01 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On May 3, 2008, at 8:37 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>> William Warren wrote:
>>> That also doesn't take into account how many /8's are being hoarded
>>> by
>>> organizations that don't need even 25% of that space.
>> which one's would those be?
>
> Whi
> note that joe's example brings up the interface before starting the name
> server program, and bringing it down if the name server program exits.
> this presumes that the name server will start very quickly, and that while
> running, it is healthy. since i've seen name server programs be unhealt
17 matches
Mail list logo
