Notwithstanding that fact that keepalives are a huge issue for tiny battery powered devices. There's a false economy in assuming those packets wouldn't have to be sent with IPV6...
Marc Manthey wrote: > evening all , > > found an related article about the power consumtion saving in ip6. > > - > > Up to 300 Megawatt Worth of Keepalive Messages to be Saved by IPv6? > > http://www.circleid.com/posts/81072_megawatts_keepalive_ipv6/ > > http://www.niksula.hut.fi/~peronen/publications/haverinen_siren_eronen_vtc2007.pdf > > > still interested in other links and publications > > > regards > > Marc > > -- > "Use your imagination not to scare yourself to death > but to inspire yourself to life." > > Les enfants teribbles - research and deployment > Marc Manthey - head of research and innovation > Hildeboldplatz 1a D - 50672 Köln - Germany > Tel.:0049-221-3558032 > Mobil:0049-1577-3329231 > jabber :[EMAIL PROTECTED] > blog : http://www.let.de > ipv6 http://www.ipsix.org > xing : https://www.xing.com/profile/Marc_Manthey > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > NANOG@nanog.org > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog > _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
