I will personally always prefer hardware based methods where the private
key data is never exposed over pure software based methods.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:32 AM Mauricio Rodriguez
wrote:
> My understanding is that 2-factor is one of the primary drivers for
> webauthn. I feel that ha
My understanding is that 2-factor is one of the primary drivers for
webauthn. I feel that hardware dongles are the thing of the past, with
software now being available that runs on your smartphone and serves the
same function. Example - Google Authenticator.
__
Regards,
Mauricio Rodriguez
Keep it short!
Roxanna I. Cieplinska
M: + 1 (415) 412-7699
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 5:50 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> I know it's a little tangential, but it's a huge operational issue for
> network operations too. Have any NANOG folks been paying at
On 3/23/19 5:18 AM, Mauricio Rodriguez wrote:
My understanding is that 2-factor is one of the primary drivers for
webauthn. I feel that hardware dongles are the thing of the past,
with software now being available that runs on your smartphone and
serves the same function. Example - Google
I know it's a little tangential, but it's a huge operational issue for
network operations too. Have any NANOG folks been paying attention to
webauthn? i didn't know about until yesterday, though i wrote a proof of
concept of something that looks a lot like webauthn in 2012. The
5 matches
Mail list logo
