On 13/Apr/16 20:30, Colton Conor wrote:
> How does the ASR 903 compare to the 920? When we got pricing for the
> ASR 903 it was more expensive than a real ASR 9k router.
Feature-wise, it's more mature than the ASR920, as it came before.
Personally, I find it more of a device where you need a m
How does the ASR 903 compare to the 920? When we got pricing for the ASR
903 it was more expensive than a real ASR 9k router.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 13/Apr/16 02:29, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> Someone told me to check out extreme networks, cisco or Ciena for th
chtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Simon Lockhart
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 08:23
An: Colton Conor
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Betreff: Re: mpls switches
On Tue Apr 12, 2016 at 07:29:54PM -0500, Col
On Tue Apr 12, 2016 at 07:29:54PM -0500, Colton Conor wrote:
> Someone told me to check out extreme networks, cisco or Ciena for the more
> cost effective mpls kit. Any advice on which of the three would have the
> most cost effective 10G MPLS switch?
I'm using Extreme switches for VPLS - the X460
On 13/Apr/16 02:29, Colton Conor wrote:
> Someone told me to check out extreme networks, cisco or Ciena for the
> more cost effective mpls kit. Any advice on which of the three would
> have the most cost effective 10G MPLS switch?
>
> Cisco's MPLS switch is the ASR 920 right?
The useful ones a
Someone told me to check out extreme networks, cisco or Ciena for the more
cost effective mpls kit. Any advice on which of the three would have the
most cost effective 10G MPLS switch?
Cisco's MPLS switch is the ASR 920 right?
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:13 PM, George, Wes
wrote:
>
> On 4/12/16,
On 4/12/16, 9:22 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Tim Jackson"
wrote:
>>> (Broadcom chipset,
>> approach with caution).
>
>QFX5100 works fine for MPLS.. [snip] QFX5100 is a
>great P and lightweight PE..
WG] For some values of "fine" and "great" perhaps, but emphasis on the
"lightweight" is important, a
On Tuesday, 12 April, 2016 14:04, "Colton Conor" said:
> Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
> multiple 10G ports on them. There is also the QFX series.
The EXes can also run in a "fabric extender" mode to the MX (and others?).
Depending on geographical footpr
On 12/Apr/16 15:22, Tim Jackson wrote:
> QFX5100 works fine for MPLS.. ACX5k is QFX5100 hardware, but a
> different train of software, and it's a bit different. QFX5100 is a
> great P and lightweight PE..
As a P, fine (except if you're doing NG-MVPN, of course, which would
make it a poor branch
>> Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
>> multiple 10G ports on them.
>
> They do, but (deliberately) broken. I wouldn't try it.
EX4600 does MPLS just fine, nothing else really does in the EX
series.. EX4200 can do 1 label. The EX4600 featureset is pretty much
the
On 12/Apr/16 15:04, Colton Conor wrote:
> Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
> multiple 10G ports on them.
They do, but (deliberately) broken. I wouldn't try it.
> There is also the QFX series.
Not that I know of, but the ACX is a QFX-derivative (Broadcom c
I know the 4500/4550 does but it requires a license.
On Apr 12, 2016 8:07 AM, "Colton Conor" wrote:
> Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
> multiple 10G ports on them. There is also the QFX series.
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Mike
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
multiple 10G ports on them. There is also the QFX series.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Mike wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Im looking to deploy more mpls in my network. I like the Cisco 3600X
> series but the low density of 10g ports
I just subscribed to NANOG and I already learned something new.
I did not know about WhiteBox switches. I like how the price tag is
plainly visible to all. This "contact a salesperson" requirement gets
old very quickly.
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 22:12:37 -0400
David Bass wrote:
> Interesting. What SD
Dear Mr. Mike,
I would recommend HP A5500-HI. It's a very capable L3 routing switch (12k FIB)
aswell as MPLS forwarder - both P and PE. It has two 10 GbE SFP+ ports and is
expandable to a total of six if you add two modules. The price is about 2000
dollars (new) and you can stack them aswell us
On 7/Apr/16 02:02, Mike wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Im looking to deploy more mpls in my network. I like the Cisco
> 3600X series but the low density of 10g ports has me wanting to
> consider perhaps others. I would love a minimum of 4 10g ports but of
> course more is better. Cost would also be a fact
ZTE 5950 serie MPLS routing switches are about 1500 to 3000 USD depending
on configuration. They have a 4x 10G subcard. The CLI is very Cisco like.
The ZTE 5960 has 32 or 64 x 10G but starts at 5k-6k.
Regards
Baldur
Den 7. apr. 2016 02.05 skrev "Mike" :
> Hi,
>
> Im looking to deploy more m
Interesting. What SDN controller are you using?
Seems like quite a few are moving to white box switches...
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Todd Crane wrote:
>
> Edge-Core 5712-54X
Mike,
Nor sure how much you know about SDN or if you are in anywhere near being able
to make the transition, but white-label switches may be a deciding factor for
you. In fact you may be able to do it without SDN, but I cannot say for sure as
we have ours configured in SDN mode. We use Edge-Cor
Hi,
Im looking to deploy more mpls in my network. I like the Cisco
3600X series but the low density of 10g ports has me wanting to consider
perhaps others. I would love a minimum of 4 10g ports but of course more
is better. Cost would also be a factor. What are people using these days?
T
20 matches
Mail list logo
