On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:18:24 -0800, Owen DeLong said:
> On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:58 , Karl Auer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 08:08 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> >> I recommend keeping your network as congruent between IPv4 and IPv6 as
> >> possible, with dual-stack.
> > Why?
> For one thing, doin
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 07:58:10AM +1100, Karl Auer wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 08:08 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > I recommend keeping your network as congruent between IPv4 and IPv6 as
> > possible, with dual-stack.
>
> Why?
I asked a similar question a few years ago:
http://seclists.or
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:58 , Karl Auer wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 08:08 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> I recommend keeping your network as congruent between IPv4 and IPv6 as
>> possible, with dual-stack.
>
> Why?
>
For one thing, doing otherwise violates the principle of least astonishment.
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 08:08 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I recommend keeping your network as congruent between IPv4 and IPv6 as
> possible, with dual-stack.
Why?
Regards, K.
--
~~~
Karl Auer (ka...@biplane.com.au)
http://www.bi
Hi,
On Feb 14, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Deric Kwok wrote:
> Can I know how many ipv6 full bgp table routes now?
Here are various sources to discover the size of the IPv6 internet routing
table:
http://public01.infra.ring.nlnog.net/munin/infra.ring.nlnog.net/lg01.infra.ring.nlnog.net/bird6.
Not based of IRR =D
Foundry CER2K
12111 BGP
Number of Neighbors Configured: 7, UP: 5
Number of Routes Installed: 22866, Uses 1966476 bytes
Number of Routes Advertising to All Neighbors: 53961 (41844 entries),
Uses 2008512 bytes
Number of Attribute Entries Installed: 22746, Us
Can I know how many ipv6 full bgp table routes now?
Right now there are about 15k routes.
8k when you filter based on IRR.
--
//fredan
The Last Mile Cache - http://tlmc.fredan.se
On Feb 14, 2013, at 8:02 AM, Deric Kwok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Can I know how many ipv6 full bgp table routes now?
Right now there are about 15k routes.
> how many memory can run one ipv6 full bgp table?
This depends on the platform.
> how many peer for ipv6 in Router reflector you suggest?
T
Hi all
Can I know how many ipv6 full bgp table routes now?
how many memory can run one ipv6 full bgp table?
how many peer for ipv6 in Router reflector you suggest?
Do you suggest to separate the ipv4 and ipv6 in router reflector?
Thank you for your info
On 2011/03/11 3:51 PM, ann kok wrote:
ping6 -I eth0 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1
connect: Cannot assign requested address
Maybe duplicate address detection? Are you statically assigning this
address? Have you checked your kernel log?
--
/Jason
Hi Jason
Thank you. Can I know what is wrong?
ping6 -I eth0 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1
connect: Cannot assign requested address
Thank you
--- On Fri, 3/11/11, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> From: Jason Bertoch
> Subject: Re: ipv6 question
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Received: Friday, March 11
On 2011/03/11 3:36 PM, ann kok wrote:
What is this meaning?
ping6 -l eth0 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1
ping: bad preload value, should be 1..65536
That was a capital "i" not a lower case "L". man ping6
--
/Jason
Hi
What is this meaning?
ping6 -l eth0 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1
ping: bad preload value, should be 1..65536
Thank you
--- On Fri, 3/11/11, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> From: Jason Bertoch
> Subject: Re: ipv6 question
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Received: Friday, March 11, 2011, 3:31 PM
On 2011/03/11 3:19 PM, ann kok wrote:
Thank you. I try your way. the ipv6 address is on eth0 interface.
I try to run ping6 the fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1%eth0
lt is same problem!
Try ping6 -I eth0 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1
--
/Jason
, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
> Subject: Re: ipv6 question
> To: "ann kok"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Received: Friday, March 11, 2011, 2:21 PM
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:15:36 PST, ann
> kok said:
>
> > inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe3
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:15:36 PST, ann kok said:
> inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1/64 Scope:Link
This is a link level address, only valid on one interface. So you need to look
at which interface it is attached to in the ifconfig output.
> ping6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1
> connect: Invalid ar
:1 is fine
ping6 ::1
PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=7.18 ms
64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.050 ms
--- On Wed, 3/9/11, Karl Auer wrote:
> From: Karl Auer
> Subject: Re: ipv6 question
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Received: Wednesday, M
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 11:43 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <1299711449.2109.98.camel@karl>, Karl Auer writes:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:01 -0600, imNet Administrator wrote:
> > > Where are you pinging it from? also, the 2001:db8::/32 prefix is used
> > > for "documentation purposes" and
In message <1299711449.2109.98.camel@karl>, Karl Auer writes:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:01 -0600, imNet Administrator wrote:
> > Where are you pinging it from? also, the 2001:db8::/32 prefix is used
> > for "documentation purposes" and might be handled differently by the
> > TCP/IP stack.
>
> Wo
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:01 -0600, imNet Administrator wrote:
> Where are you pinging it from? also, the 2001:db8::/32 prefix is used
> for "documentation purposes" and might be handled differently by the
> TCP/IP stack.
Works fine in Linux - I've been using it (in an isolated training room
setup)
On 3/9/2011 8:41 AM, ann kok wrote:
> Hi
>
> I read ipv6forum.pdf about ipv6
>
> It said
>
> MTU must be at least 1280 bytes (1500+)
> Does it mean to set the mtu over 1500
No, it simply means that the minimum MTU for IPv6 is 1280.
>
> I set my linux box eth0 as 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 but
Hi
I read ipv6forum.pdf about ipv6
It said
MTU must be at least 1280 bytes (1500+)
Does it mean to set the mtu over 1500
I set my linux box eth0 as 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 but I can't ping it
inet6 2001:db8:cafe:::12/64 scope global tentative
ls it this problem? Thank you
# ping6 200
You're literally talking about modifying code on every computer, router,
printer,
and other device with an IP address as well as updating every application,
routing protocol, etc. Pretty much the same set of requirements for deploying
IPv6, but, with IPv6, we've at least already done the code on m
Greetings,
This may seem like a stupid question, but in IPV4 there are a few
"reserved" bits which I've not seen used, but perhaps I am behind the times.
With regard to these, what if one was to use such to delegate a second venue
of IP space? In otherwords flip a bit in the flags reser
24 matches
Mail list logo
