Randy Bush wrote:
> for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in
> rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F=
> rejected RCPT : blocked because 118.39.80.118
> is in blacklist at
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> hold your nose
>
> zgrep '<=.*\[:' /var/spool/exim/log/main* | wc
> zgrep '<=' /var/spool/exim/log/main* | wc
>
> and the ever failthful bc :)
err... one of 4 MX's for home email... (I'll catch the others later on)
v6 inbound: $ egrep '\[2.
> "RB" == Randy Bush writes:
>>> 7.8% is over ipv6 transport
>>> but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6.
This is incoming only, mostly mailing lists (including a few *busy* ones):
:; zgrep -Ec 'client=[^[]+\[[^]]+:' /var/log/mail.info* |awk -F: '{i+=$NF} END
{print i}'
33966
:;
On 1/4/2012 10:46 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I suspect the higher inbound values might be due to tech mailling
lists which tend to come from IPv6 enabled hosts ?
Yeah, all of my (non-internal) ipv6 mail is from such mailing lists.
-Dave
On 1/4/2012 5:10 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in
> rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F=
> rejected RCPT : blocked because 118.39.80.118
>
Randy Bush wrote, on 01/04/2012 05:10 AM:
> 7.8% is over ipv6 transport
>
> but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6.
A consequence of whitelisting?
Simon
--
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source--> http://ecdysis.viageni
In a message written on Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:18:11AM -0500, Jared Mauch
wrote:
> Similar footprint, and I have something like the following on puck:
>
> puck:~$ grep IPv6: /var/log/maillog | grep stat=Sent | wc -l
> 9043
> puck:~$ grep stat=Sent /var/log/maillog | wc -l
> 110343
I have a ma
Received
# grep 'amavis' mail.log | grep Passed | wc -l
1411 (1189 if only counting CLEAN, post amavisd)
#grep 'amavis' mail.log | grep Passed | grep IPv6 | grep -v '::1' | wc -l
255 (253 if only counting CLEAN - so less spam in IPv6 :)
Sent
# grep 'postfix/smtp' mail.log | g
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> zgrep '<=.*\[:' /var/spool/exim/log/main* | wc
> zgrep '<=' /var/spool/exim/log/main* | wc
frodo:/home/suresh# zgrep '<=.*\[:' /var/log/exim4/mainlog* | wc
16673 385620 7023087
frodo:/home/suresh# zgrep '<=' /var/log/exim4/mainlog* |
On Jan 4, 2012, at 5:26 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> 7.8% is over ipv6 transport
>>> but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6.
>> What's your primary configuration ? Hub, end user system ?
>
> the main smtp receiver and sender for maybe 100 users and a few
> dozen mailing list of small to
Am 04.01.2012 11:10, schrieb Randy Bush:
> for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in
> rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F=
> rejected RCPT : blocked because 118.39.80.118
>> 7.8% is over ipv6 transport
>> but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6.
> What's your primary configuration ? Hub, end user system ?
the main smtp receiver and sender for maybe 100 users and a few
dozen mailing list of small to lower middle class size.
> Care to share the methodolog
Randy Bush (randy) writes:
>
> 7.8% is over ipv6 transport
>
> but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6.
>
> what do other folk see?
What's your primary configuration ? Hub, end user system ?
Care to share the methodology ? I can run some stats, but want
to be
for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like
2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in
rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F= rejected
RCPT : blocked because 118.39.80.118 is in
blacklist at rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org: Mail
14 matches
Mail list logo
