On 07/30/2012 09:23 PM, Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail) wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2012, at 15:04, joel jaeggli wrote:
>
>> On 7/30/12 10:57 AM, Steven Noble wrote:
>>> The fix for this issue is trivial. Every new signup ...
>> Most of the subscribers to the mailing list never post.
>>
> +1 (from an invet
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Update from the NANOG Communications Committee regarding
>> recent off-topic posts
>>
>> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:25:56 -0400, Robert Drake said:
>>
>> > Percentages: 5804/54166=1% of posts from low contributors.
>>
-
> From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 4:56 PM
> To: Robert Drake
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Update from the NANOG Communications Committee regarding
> recent off-topic posts
>
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 1
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:25:56 -0400, Robert Drake said:
> Percentages: 5804/54166=1% of posts from low contributors.
I suspect you fat-fingered something - I get 10.7%, not 1%, for that
calculation...
pgpGDidhtOsTj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 7/30/2012 1:42 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
I'm sorry Panashe is upset by this rule. Interestingly, "Your search - Panashe
Flack nanog - did not match any documents." So my guess is that a post from that
account has not happened before, meaning the post was moderated yet still made it thr
On 07/30/2012 10:57 AM, Steven Noble wrote:
The fix for this issue is trivial. Every new signup should require a sponsor or
a deposit of funds into a new member fund. Once a member has made a relevant
post regarding a NANOG related item their funds are returned.
If someone spams they forfeit t
- Original Message -
> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore"
> Except, of course, it has been called the Communications Committee for
> a while now. (The change was made because the committee took
> responsibility for more than just the mailing list.)
My turn for "silly me".
> But 1 change in 7 ye
On Jul 30, 2012, at 15:04, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 7/30/12 10:57 AM, Steven Noble wrote:
>> The fix for this issue is trivial. Every new signup ...
> Most of the subscribers to the mailing list never post.
>
>>
+1 (from an inveterate but VERY appreciative lurker)
..Allen
On list spam has been minimal but off list cold call type emails have
been mounting for several months
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-07-30, at 5:29 PM, "Brian Dickson" wrote:
>>
>> As a quick update, we've implemented some list settings last week
>> to help
>> to
>>
>> keep spam off the list.
>
> As a quick update, we've implemented some list settings last week to help
> to
>
> keep spam off the list. New subscribers are moderated until we're
> comfortable
> with their posts. We rejected the idea of keyword based message filtering
> since not only is a lot of work to maintain, it's tr
On Jul 30, 2012, at 16:35 , Jay Ashworth wrote:
>> thanks MLC or whatever it calls itself this week
>
> C'mon, Randy; It's been called that since it kicked me off 7 years ago. :-)
Except, of course, it has been called the Communications Committee for a while
now. (The change was made because
- Original Message -
> From: "Randy Bush"
> thanks MLC or whatever it calls itself this week
C'mon, Randy; It's been called that since it kicked me off 7 years ago. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer
On 7/30/12 10:57 AM, Steven Noble wrote:
The fix for this issue is trivial. Every new signup should require a sponsor or
a deposit of funds into a new member fund. Once a member has made a relevant
post regarding a NANOG related item their funds are returned.
If someone spams they forfeit the
To: Etaoin Shrdlu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Update from the NANOG Communications Committee regarding recent
off-topic posts
Sent: Jul 30, 2012 13:15
> I applaud this change.
thanks MLC or whatever it calls itself this week
randy
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> I applaud this change.
thanks MLC or whatever it calls itself this week
randy
The fix for this issue is trivial. Every new signup should require a sponsor or
a deposit of funds into a new member fund. Once a member has made a relevant
post regarding a NANOG related item their funds are returned.
If someone spams they forfeit the money and it is used to help defray the cos
On 7/30/2012 12:04 PM, Panashe Flack wrote:
As a quick update, we've implemented some list settings last week to help to
keep spam off the list. New subscribers are moderated until we're comfortable
with their posts...
I dislike this change - how long are subscribers considered "new"?
I app
I'm sorry Panashe is upset by this rule. Interestingly, "Your search - Panashe
Flack nanog - did not match any documents." So my guess is that a post from
that account has not happened before, meaning the post was moderated yet still
made it through.
Has anyone done a data mining experiment t
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:04:36 +0200, Panashe Flack said:
> list for continued activity. And just for reference - have you guys
> SEEN the "Linux Kernel Mailing List"? - it gets frequent spam posts
> and yet is perfectly able to ignore the spam/irrelevant posts and
> continue on its remit.
For those
> As a quick update, we've implemented some list settings last week to help to
> keep spam off the list. New subscribers are moderated until we're
> comfortable
> with their posts. We rejected the idea of keyword based message filtering
> since not only is a lot of work to maintain, it's trivi
As a quick update, we've implemented some list settings last week to help to
keep spam off the list. New subscribers are moderated until we're comfortable
with their posts. We rejected the idea of keyword based message filtering
since not only is a lot of work to maintain, it's trivial to get a
21 matches
Mail list logo
