On 10/11/11 8:19 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Should be pretty easy to convince the hotel that upselling NANOGers
internet isn't going to result in revenue unless their network somehow
miraculously handles the load.
Instead, they can look forward to ~500 people wanting that charge
reversed on checkou
On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:44 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 10/10/11 17:12 , Randy Carpenter wrote:
>>
>> Very nice. I wonder if this is an option we could try to use in
>> future meetings. It makes sense, really, since we already have decent
>> connectivity for the conference areas, and we wouldn't b
On 10/10/11 17:12 , Randy Carpenter wrote:
>
> Very nice. I wonder if this is an option we could try to use in
> future meetings. It makes sense, really, since we already have decent
> connectivity for the conference areas, and we wouldn't be destroying
> the hotel's outside connection (only their
On Oct 10, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Noah Weis wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> The hotel is in the process of deploying an SSID throughout the guest room
>> network that terminates to the NANOG external router, rather than the
>> hotel's gateway.
>>
>>
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, John Curran wrote:
On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
Very nice. I wonder if this is an option we could try to use in future
meetings. It makes sense, really, since we already have decent connectivity
for the conference areas, and we wouldn't be destroyin
great idea. next, it would be nice to be able to get a dhcp address
from it
randy
On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> Very nice. I wonder if this is an option we could try to use in future
> meetings. It makes sense, really, since we already have decent connectivity
> for the conference areas, and we wouldn't be destroying the hotel's outside
> connection (
Very nice. I wonder if this is an option we could try to use in future
meetings. It makes sense, really, since we already have decent connectivity for
the conference areas, and we wouldn't be destroying the hotel's outside
connection (only their WiFi ;-) )
-Randy
- Original Message
Noah -
Very nice... I also notice it's IPv6 enabled. :-)
Thanks!
/John
On Oct 10, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Noah Weis wrote:
> All,
>
> The hotel is in the process of deploying an SSID throughout the guest room
> network that terminates to the NANOG external router, rather than the
> hotel's gatew
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Noah Weis wrote:
> All,
>
> The hotel is in the process of deploying an SSID throughout the guest room
> network that terminates to the NANOG external router, rather than the
> hotel's gateway.
>
> The SSID is NANOG-guest.
>
> They stated it will take a couple of h
10 matches
Mail list logo
