On 2/6/15 11:32 AM, Donn Lasher wrote:
> Properly engineered, however, is the key. Make sure whom-ever is building
> your links looks at vendor specs, builds a real link budget (including
> losses from connectors, cable, grounding, etc) properly weather seals
> everything, and try to get at least a
Just in case anyone looks this thread up
in the future...
We're likely going with Aviat and their
"DAC GE card EXD-181-002" cards.
>From the company: "Yes the Ethernet card
does support jumbo frame size, IPV6 and
MPLS EXP bits, QOS and VLANs with 802.1q
tagging."
scott
because I have a partial implementation of MPLS routers. Whether the
routers support MPLS or not, the routing on an OSPF level doesn't depend on
MPLS being enabled. Eventually everything will be MPLS-capable. The MPLS
network is not multiple-path. The OSPF network is.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:
On 6/Feb/15 00:31, Eric Louie wrote:
> I work for a fixed wireless provider, and our mpls-capable backhauls are
> all running mpls with 9200 MTU with no problem. The only weirdness I
> encounter is if I have multiple equal-cost routes to the same location, one
> over MPLS and one not, end up havi
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Scott
> Weeks
> Sent: Saturday, 7 February 2015 5:26 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: mpls over microwave
>
>
> There is no choice in this situation. I get what
> I get
One more add:
Properly engineered, fixed wireless links can have better-than-wireline
availability. Two jobs ago, we had customer links with zero dropped
packets in 5 years, which is outstanding compared to most copper-based
services.
Properly engineered, however, is the key. Make sure whom-ever
>-Original Message->
>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks
>Thanks everyone,
> I feel a lot more confident on this project after
> this discussion. I will be working with a comm
> engineer who'll be doing the various radio links.
> I just need to be s
Kakaroukas
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 5:46 AM
To: 'sur...@mauigateway.com'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: mpls over microwave
Hey,
We run few mpls links ( 7600s/3600s on the mpls side mostly ) over Ceragon
wireless gear. Nothing too fancy, I just treat them as switches ( or even just
&q
Hey,
We run few mpls links ( 7600s/3600s on the mpls side mostly ) over Ceragon
wireless gear. Nothing too fancy, I just treat them as switches ( or even just
"cables" for some boxes, not doing mac learning at all ). No issues whatsoever
on the networking side.
My thoughts and words are my o
nt: Thursday, February 05, 2015 11:42 PM
>To: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: mpls over microwave
>Thanks everyone,
>I feel a lot more confident on this project after this discussion. I will be
>working with a comm engineer who'll be doing the various radio links.
>I just n
un...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Naslund, Steve
Sent: Friday, 6 February 2015 10:39 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: mpls over microwave
We run Dragonwave systems and have no issues at all. MPLS in itself doesn't
make a difference since the gear is a straight Ethernet link. Just make sure
yo
Thanks everyone,
I feel a lot more confident on this project after
this discussion. I will be working with a comm
engineer who'll be doing the various radio links.
I just need to be sure he can make the best
decision as we're moving from ATM to MPLS and he
doesn't understand the networking
We run Dragonwave systems and have no issues at all. MPLS in itself doesn't
make a difference since the gear is a straight Ethernet link. Just make sure
your gear handles your frame sizes and tagging and you should be good.
As long as your radio link is engineered right you should have high
--- davidbass...@gmail.com wrote:
Always used Ethernet handoffs on the radios to keep
things simple.
-
Had to run off to a meeting. Back now. This is
one thing I was worried about. I'm not doing the
radio part. Someone else is. I didn't know if
folks do pu
Done it, and it works well. Used Motorola radios, and the key is the radio and
building that part of the infrastructure right. The MPLS is just another IP
packet to the wireless. Always used Ethernet handoffs on the radios to keep
things simple.
Make sure you have good line of site, have a
I work for a fixed wireless provider, and our mpls-capable backhauls are
all running mpls with 9200 MTU with no problem. The only weirdness I
encounter is if I have multiple equal-cost routes to the same location, one
over MPLS and one not, end up having ping/unreachable issues from my
monitoring
Not doing anymore, but I have in a previous life. It works. What's more
important is how you engineered your radios and what you're using...
Best regards,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 1
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 3:58 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: mpls over microwave
Shouldn't really be any different as long as your gear supports the appropriate
MTUs.
-
Mike Ha
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> Anyone doing MPLS over microwave radios? Please
> share your experiences on list or off.
--- ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote:
From: Adair Winter
We are. What would you like to know?
-
What
Shouldn't really be any different as long as your gear supports the appropriate
MTUs.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Weeks"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 3:55:04 PM
Subject:
We are. What would you like to know?
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> Anyone doing MPLS over microwave radios? Please
> share your experiences on list or off.
>
> scott
>
--
Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
21 matches
Mail list logo
