On 6/Feb/15 00:31, Eric Louie wrote: > I work for a fixed wireless provider, and our mpls-capable backhauls are > all running mpls with 9200 MTU with no problem. The only weirdness I > encounter is if I have multiple equal-cost routes to the same location, one > over MPLS and one not, end up having ping/unreachable issues from my > monitoring equipment. The solution has been to cost one path (the MPLS) > lower than the other. The only other problem I had was with radio's that > didn't support larger 9000+ byte MTU packets - we've phased that radio out > for now. if you run MPLS with 1500 byte MTU, you'll have issues with 1500 > byte packets with the DF-bit set. That was a nasty discovery in the > production network, your mileage will not vary with that problem.
I'm curious why you'd have multiple paths in your network (equal-cost to boot) where some support and others don't. Mark.
