David said:* Gotta watch out for specifying T1 when you want Ethernet- they
could just give you 4 wires on pins 1,2,4,5 :)*
I think Patrick was thinking back in the days when Ethernet was just two
pairs. You could get away with a lot on 10BaseT, I've even used dry telco
pairs between buildings wh
> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore"
> Colo providers are absolutely worried about drops in xconn revenue.
> Look at some large colo providers who are public and split out their
> numbers. Youll see that the percentage of their profit from xconns is
> usually more than double the percentage of their reven
big drop in revenue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
utions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>
>>> From: "Brandon Butterworth"
>&
oore's law...
_
From: Brandon Butterworth
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh
To: ,
Cc:
If they've based their model on extracting profit proportional
to technology speed then they've misunderstood Moore's law
brandon
m
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -----
>>
>> From: "Brandon Butterworth"
>> To: br...@pobox.com, d...@temk.in
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 8:55:57 AM
>> Subject: Re: cross connects and their pound of fles
ions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Brandon Butterworth"
> To: br...@pobox.com, d...@temk.in
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 8
From: "Brandon Butterworth"
To: br...@pobox.com, d...@temk.in
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 8:55:57 AM
Subject: Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh
Dave Temkin wrote:
> And as colo operators get freaked out over margin compression on the
> impen
Dave Temkin wrote:
> And as colo operators get freaked out over margin compression on the
> impending 10->100G conversion (which is happening exponentially faster than
> 100->1G & 1G->10G) they'll need to move those levers of spend around
> regardless.
If they've based their model on extracting p
8:19:16 AM
Subject: Re: cross connects and their pound of flesh
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Brandon Ross wrote:
>
>
> Value based pricing is all the rage these days, which is why they charge
> you so much for cross connects.
Exactly. Not that I don't like free cros
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Brandon Ross wrote:
>
>
> Value based pricing is all the rage these days, which is why they charge
> you so much for cross connects.
Exactly. Not that I don't like free cross connects (they're the bees knees,
in fact), but at the end of the day, an existing col
11 matches
Mail list logo
