I believe Verizon's specs for 4G devices required v6 support from the start:
http://www.personal.psu.edu/dvm105/blogs/ipv6/2009/06/verizon-mandates-ipv6-support.html
I seem to recall IPv6 support being a requirement for smartphones on their 3G
network as well, but I can't find a reference for th
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:20 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:54:38 EST, Christopher Morrow said:
>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:15 PM, wrote:
>> > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:49:37 EST, Christopher Morrow said:
>> >
>> >> on this, I HOPE vzw does the right thing and launches with v4/v6
>> >> duals
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:54:38 EST, Christopher Morrow said:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:15 PM, wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:49:37 EST, Christopher Morrow said:
> >
> >> on this, I HOPE vzw does the right thing and launches with v4/v6
> >> dualstack on the devices in all regions where deployme
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On 12/28/10 10:35 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>> FWIW, the same does not appear to be true of the Verizon 3G network. (Not
>> that anyone expected it to be.) My VZW device has a NATted v4 address and
>> only link-local v6.
>
> lack of a chips
On 12/28/10 10:35 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> FWIW, the same does not appear to be true of the Verizon 3G network. (Not
> that anyone expected it to be.) My VZW device has a NATted v4 address and
> only link-local v6.
lack of a chipset support is a notable problem there
joel
> On Dec 28, 2
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:15 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:49:37 EST, Christopher Morrow said:
>
>> on this, I HOPE vzw does the right thing and launches with v4/v6
>> dualstack on the devices in all regions where deployment happens. I
^^
(note critical caveat)
>>
FWIW, the same does not appear to be true of the Verizon 3G network. (Not
that anyone expected it to be.) My VZW device has a NATted v4 address and
only link-local v6.
On Dec 28, 2010 1:26 PM, "Cameron Byrne" wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:15 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:49:37 E...
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Rolling a totally new thing out to 100% of the user base on the same day
will rarely end well.
If this is LTE only the it's a "totally new thing" anyway and I doubt some
extra IPv6 troubles will hurt that much more :P
--
Mikael Abrahamsson
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:15 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:49:37 EST, Christopher Morrow said:
>
>> on this, I HOPE vzw does the right thing and launches with v4/v6
>> dualstack on the devices in all regions where deployment happens. I
>> don't have much hope that this will actually happen
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:49:37 EST, Christopher Morrow said:
> on this, I HOPE vzw does the right thing and launches with v4/v6
> dualstack on the devices in all regions where deployment happens. I
> don't have much hope that this will actually happen though :(
Personally, I hope they roll it out a
On 12/28/2010 09:58 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> I googled around and could not find anything on this. Can anyone
> share their experience with IPv6 on the Verizon's LTE network? It is
> my understanding that it would be a dual-stack service, but i have not
> seen any screenshots or reviews that me
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I googled around and could not find anything on this. Can anyone
> share their experience with IPv6 on the Verizon's LTE network? It is
I had thought the capable devices weren't hitting the market for ~2-3
weeks still?[0]
> my
12 matches
Mail list logo
