Re: Why no SIDR for 174.128.31.0/24

2009-01-13 Thread David Conrad
On Jan 13, 2009, at 12:17 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote: Interresting that you say that. Still using 3ffe::/24 and ip6.int I guess? :) The delegation for ip6.int was removed quite some time ago. Regards, -drc

Re: Why no SIDR for 174.128.31.0/24

2009-01-13 Thread Jeroen Massar
bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:17:24AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: >> bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: >> [..] >>> there is some indication that this prefix was assigned for >>> a specific experiment, the experiment ran, results published, >>> and

Re: Why no SIDR for 174.128.31.0/24

2009-01-13 Thread bmanning
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:17:24AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: > bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > [..] > > there is some indication that this prefix was assigned for > > a specific experiment, the experiment ran, results published, > > and then the prefix was not properly reclaim

Re: Why no SIDR for 174.128.31.0/24

2009-01-13 Thread Jeroen Massar
bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: [..] > there is some indication that this prefix was assigned for > a specific experiment, the experiment ran, results published, > and then the prefix was not properly reclaimed... and so was > reused for something else. Interresting