bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:17:24AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: >> bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: >> [..] >>> there is some indication that this prefix was assigned for >>> a specific experiment, the experiment ran, results published, >>> and then the prefix was not properly reclaimed... and so was >>> reused for something else. >> Interresting that you say that. Still using 3ffe::/24 and ip6.int I >> guess? :) You clearly thought you needed to keep your 'customers' >> connected on the 6bone using that block of space. > > you guess wrong.
Not a guess, it is what you wrote, long live archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nanog@nanog.org/msg00270.html has: 8<----------------------------- bmanning wrote: [..] Sure... there are only a few left. Got rid of two a couple weeks back. That said.... I will announce the prefix as long as people are using it. (whine away) [..] ----------------------------->8 Other references you probably still have unread in your mailbox. Greets, Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
