Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-11 Thread Mel Beckman
...@sherwoodoregon.gov>> a écrit : -Original Message- From: NANOG mailto:sherwoodoregon@nanog.org>> On Behalf Of Bill Woodcock Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 11:37 AM To: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: The role of Internet governance in sanc

RE: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Brandon Price
-Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Bill Woodcock Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 11:37 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions >Perhaps not. My goal is to minimize Internet disconnection. Maybe that’s not >your goal. I was

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread bzs
On March 10, 2022 at 15:25 m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) wrote: > In my view, there is a core problematic statement in this document: > > “Military and propaganda agencies and their information infrastructure are > potential targets of sanctions.” > > What is a “propaganda agency”. A po

Fwd: Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread surfer
    Using a few emails... - otoh, i would likely close such meager services as i provide to russian - I think it is a colossal mistake to weaponize the Internet. - Keeping the rest of the internet as functional as possible It is not "Russia" doing this. It is the Russian governmen

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Mel Beckman
You’ve started implementation so a policy with virtually no public input on the day after making your proposal public. I’m pretty sure that’s not how the Internet works. -mel On Mar 10, 2022, at 11:38 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:  On Mar 10, 2022, at 5:42 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: I don’t unders

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Bill Woodcock
> On Mar 10, 2022, at 5:42 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: > I don’t understand your comment. I don’t think our statements are the same at > all. Perhaps not. My goal is to minimize Internet disconnection. Maybe that’s not your goal. I was trying to give what you wrote the most generous possible i

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Mel Beckman
+1 e07 -mel via cell On Mar 10, 2022, at 8:46 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:  Propaganda is in the eye of the beholder, and we’ve seen both sides of the political aisle sling this term in recent elections and legislative debates. I agree with this as well. History has shown us that the smallest sli

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Tom Beecher
> > Propaganda is in the eye of the beholder, and we’ve seen both sides of the > political aisle sling this term in recent elections and legislative debates. > I agree with this as well. History has shown us that the smallest sliver of 'interpretation' is likely to eventually be twisted and explo

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Mel Beckman
Bill, I don’t understand your comment. I don’t think our statements are the same at all. I’m opposed to this particular description of ad-hoc “social justice” in Internet governance described in your proposal. It’s far too broad and open to interpretation. You, on the other hand, seem to be r

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Bill Woodcock
> On Mar 10, 2022, at 4:25 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: > In my view, there is a core problematic statement in this document: > I think it is a colossal mistake to weaponize the Internet. The potential for > unintended consequences is huge. It sounds like your problem statement and ours are the same

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Michael Hallgren
+1 mh 10 mars 2022 16:34 "jim deleskie" mailto:deles...@gmail.com?to=%22jim%20deleskie%22%20)> a écrit: I respect the people and goals here, but strongly echo Mel's statement. This is a much larger hammer then mail filtering lists. -jim On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, 11:26 AM Mel Beckman mailto:m...

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread jim deleskie
I respect the people and goals here, but strongly echo Mel's statement. This is a much larger hammer then mail filtering lists. -jim On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, 11:26 AM Mel Beckman wrote: > In my view, there is a core problematic statement in this document: > > “Military and propaganda agencies and

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Mel Beckman
In my view, there is a core problematic statement in this document: “Military and propaganda agencies and their information infrastructure are potential targets of sanctions.” What is a “propaganda agency”. A political party? An incumbent candidate for re-election? The IRS? Anyone the “majority

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Randy Bush
maybe it is just that i am sufficiently anti-authoritarian that i try not to have the hubris to set myself up as the authority. maybe that in itself is hubris. as i was raised by someone who was a conscious objector in ww2, i can not bring myself to contribute to weapons etc. so i have donated t

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Bill Woodcock
> On Mar 10, 2022, at 1:24 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > while i abhor the russian invasion of the ukraine, and have put my money > where my mouth is (As an aside to others, our friends at the .UA ccTLD have recommended this as a useful place to donate: https://www.comebackalive.in.ua/donate It’s p

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

2022-03-10 Thread Randy Bush
while i abhor the russian invasion of the ukraine, and have put my money where my mouth is , i worry about the precedent of setting ourselves up as legislature, police, judge, and jury, and the long term effects of centralizing such authority. who will we censor and ostracize next? a walt kelly c