On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:16, Jeff Wasilko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:53:58PM -0500, Dantzig, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:
> >
>
> Let me 2nd the mighty mo! We went with them, and had our cabling
> contractor pre-wire the switch faces to patch panel
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:53:58PM -0500, Dantzig, Brian wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:
>
> > Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable
> management on
> > 6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of
> our
> > facilities,..
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1040489
-Original Message-
From: Positively Optimistic [mailto:positivelyoptimis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:07 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management...
Do any of our fellow nanog members have experi
@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management...
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:
> Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable management on
> 6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of our
> facilities,.. and un
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Matthew Topper wrote:
Maybe I'm thinking about this the wrong way, but it seems to be that
that would be a huge problem when you need to change out a cable or
move something. Do the benefits outweigh the headaches with this kind
of setup?
Keeping the 'unseen' copper/fiber
On 9/21/10 8:23 AM, Matthew Topper wrote:
> Maybe I'm thinking about this the wrong way, but it seems to be that
> that would be a huge problem when you need to change out a cable or
> move something. Do the benefits outweigh the headaches with this kind
> of setup?
>
I can't speak for others,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:19:50AM -0400, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:
> http://www.cecommunication.com/pages/cablemgmtproducts.html
>
> I have no affiliation with them nor do I even have any - but they do look
> nice. They claim to not block blade
Maybe I'm thinking about this the wrong way, but it seems to be that
that would be a huge problem when you need to change out a cable or
move something. Do the benefits outweigh the headaches with this kind
of setup?
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 21/09/2010 06:07, Po
On 9/21/10 5:38 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>
> And, of course, the easy way:
>
> http://bill.herrin.us/pictures/2008/cables-sm.jpg
>
A similar way would be MRJ21 cables and patch panels or fan out ends,
but Cisco doesn't make any line cards with it.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vax-o-matic/2465
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:
Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable management on
6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of our
facilities,.. and until it came to cable management, the switches seemed to
be a great idea...
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:
Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable management on
6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of our
facilities,.. and until it came to cable management, the switches seemed to
be a great idea...
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Positively Optimistic
wrote:
> Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable management on
> 6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of our
> facilities,.. and until it came to cable management, the switches seemed to
> b
On 21/09/2010 06:07, Positively Optimistic wrote:
Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable management on
6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of our
facilities,.. and until it came to cable management, the switches seemed to
be a great idea...
13 matches
Mail list logo
