On 8/Mar/19 13:18, Brandon Martin wrote:
>
>
> I haven't used Arista much at all really.
We are currently swapping out our Juniper EX4550's and EX4600's for
Arista's 7280SR switches, but this is purely for Layer 2 Ethernet
customer aggregation in the data centre.
The main issue we are havin
These boxes are available with 3 different FIB options currently..
7280R > 1M route
7280R2 (Jericho+) > 1.3M routes
7280R2K (Jericho+) > 2M routes
On top of the base FIB capabilities, EOS 4.21.3F adds FIB compression and
2-to-1 route compression features that give quite a bit of headroom
:34 -0600
From: Colton Conor
To: "Kaiser, Erich"
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Arista Layer3
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
So how does the 7280SR-48C6 compare to the SLX9540? They are the same
Broadcom chipset right? So the real question, is ho
On 3/8/19 5:51 AM, Brandon Martin wrote:
On 3/7/19 10:44 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
So how does the 7280SR-48C6 compare to the SLX9540? They are the same
Broadcom chipset right? So the real question, is how does the product
differ in software?
I just realized that the 7280SR is an Arista device,
On 3/7/19 10:44 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
So how does the 7280SR-48C6 compare to the SLX9540? They are the same
Broadcom chipset right? So the real question, is how does the product
differ in software?
I think a 9540 would compare more directly against a Nexus 9k series
device. They're targete
So how does the 7280SR-48C6 compare to the SLX9540? They are the same
Broadcom chipset right? So the real question, is how does the product
differ in software?
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:58 AM Kaiser, Erich wrote:
> Agreed.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:16 AM Brandon Martin
> wrote:
>
>> On
Agreed.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:16 AM Brandon Martin
wrote:
> On 3/6/19 12:36 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
> > How much do these boxes cost?
>
> List is about $100k in North America for a 9640 with all the ports
> "unlocked", full hardware kit (PSUs, fans, etc.) and some
> maintenance/support. Tak
On 3/6/19 12:36 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
How much do these boxes cost?
List is about $100k in North America for a 9640 with all the ports
"unlocked", full hardware kit (PSUs, fans, etc.) and some
maintenance/support. Take whatever your standard Brocade/Extreme
discount from that tends to loo
On 3/6/19 3:05 AM, Dmitry Sherman wrote:
Is there any reason to have 2M routes support for next 3 years?
Full IPv4 table + full IPv6 table + multiple VRFs (BGP-VPN, etc.) plus
lots of on-net deaggregates could well push you above 1M right now
especially if your platform also shares that "1M"
March 2019 at 0:47
To: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: Arista Layer3
We have been using the 7280SR-48C6 for 2.5 years now. Just after Arista
announced the full table BGP routing.
Looking at the price / port there is nothing near Arista. We also use Cisco
ASR1K and Juniper MX204 but the
How much do these boxes cost?
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:24 PM Kaiser, Erich wrote:
> It would be worth your time to look at Extreme SLX9640 with advanced
> routing license.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:47 PM Roel Parijs wrote:
>
>> We have been using the 7280SR-48C6 for 2.5 years now. Just a
It would be worth your time to look at Extreme SLX9640 with advanced
routing license.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:47 PM Roel Parijs wrote:
> We have been using the 7280SR-48C6 for 2.5 years now. Just after Arista
> announced the full table BGP routing.
> Looking at the price / port there is nothi
We have been using the 7280SR-48C6 for 2.5 years now. Just after Arista
announced the full table BGP routing.
Looking at the price / port there is nothing near Arista. We also use Cisco
ASR1K and Juniper MX204 but these have far less capacity.
When we first started, there were quite a few features
Thanks for info!
--
Dmitry Sherman
Interhost Networks Ltd
dmi...@interhost.net
Mobile: +972-54-3181182
Office: +972-74-7029881
Web: www.interhost.co.il
On 05/03/2019, 21:26, "Saku Ytti" wrote:
Hey Dmitry,
> What do you think about Arista 7280SR (DCS-7280SR-48C6-M-R) as a BGP
pee
Check out the 7280sr2k, which is actually 24*10G, 24*25G, 6*100G
On 03/05/2019 08:55 PM, David Hubbard wrote:
> I love the NCS5501, but once Arista gets the 2M-route capacity down into the
> 48x10g format, I'd jump ship in a heartbeat; currently you have to do a much
> larger chassis-based devic
On 3/5/19, 2:28 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Saku Ytti" wrote:
Hey Dmitry,
> What do you think about Arista 7280SR (DCS-7280SR-48C6-M-R) as a BGP
peering router with 3 x upstream with full route view in RIB (ipv4 + ipv6) and
another IXP feed?
> Considering switching from ASR9001 whi
Hey Dmitry,
> What do you think about Arista 7280SR (DCS-7280SR-48C6-M-R) as a BGP peering
> router with 3 x upstream with full route view in RIB (ipv4 + ipv6) and
> another IXP feed?
> Considering switching from ASR9001 which is doing perfect work but has no
> more ports left.
> The price is v
Those devices are awesome, I use those on the same usecase, and
recommend them
(I do not run pim, tho)
On 03/05/2019 07:17 PM, Dmitry Sherman wrote:
> Hello,
> What do you think about Arista 7280SR (DCS-7280SR-48C6-M-R) as a BGP peering
> router with 3 x upstream with full route view in RIB (ipv
Hello,
What do you think about Arista 7280SR (DCS-7280SR-48C6-M-R) as a BGP peering
router with 3 x upstream with full route view in RIB (ipv4 + ipv6) and another
IXP feed?
Considering switching from ASR9001 which is doing perfect work but has no more
ports left.
The price is very competitive co
While I am personally a fan of mikrotik for their ridiculously inexpensive
MPLS features, their total and complete lack of ISIS is a show stopper in a
lot of cases (and makes me sad) and their v6 support is
mostly-ok-but-still-wonky(which also makes me sad) - and ROS 7 has been
"coming soon" in the
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Romeo Czumbil
wrote:
>
> So do we have any Arista L3 people out here that can share some negatives
or positives?
We're using the Arista 7280R with Jericho(+) chips as PE routers.
We're happy with them.
Stable operation, no serious issues so far.
Feature wise they
> On Nov 30, 2017, at 11:56 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> Jared,
>
> Which Arista box do you use for FTTH features? Whats the cost like as FTTH
> boxes are usually inexpensive, and Arista is not know to be inexpensive
> compared to something like Calix or Adtran.
I use the DCS-7050S-52-F.
Their L3 stuff is as stable as their L2 stuff, in general.
MP-BGP and VRFs are a tiny bit bleeding edge/lacking features, however for
plain OSPF/BGP, they're great.
/Ruairi
On 30 November 2017 at 18:36, Romeo Czumbil
wrote:
> So I've been using Arista as layer2 for quite some time, and I'm p
Jared,
Which Arista box do you use for FTTH features? Whats the cost like as FTTH
boxes are usually inexpensive, and Arista is not know to be inexpensive
compared to something like Calix or Adtran.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 30, 2017, at 2:17 PM, Ken Chas
On 11/30/17 13:00, Ken Chase wrote:
> >Arista DCS-7280SRA-48C6 is a 1ru box.??
> >
> >Has a nominally million route fib, Jericho+ 8GB of packet buffer.
> >control-plane is 8GB of ram andAMD GX-424CC SOC which is 4 core 2.4ghz.
> >We do direct fib injection with bird rather than the arista
Ken Chase wrote:
> Sounds pretty good - hows your power draw on that thing? Why'd you pick Bird
> in this case?
this is a 7280SR pushing ~130G-140G of traffic in/out with about 75% of
the ports lit:
> Router#show env power
> Power InputOutput Output
> Supply
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:38:53PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Jared Mauch wrote:
> > Lots of folks also use MikroTik as well if the traffic is in the 1G
> > range or so.
>
> mikrotik support for ipv6 is still dodgy: recursive next-hop is not
> supported in bgp/ipv6:
>
> https://forum.mikrotik.
Jared Mauch wrote:
> Lots of folks also use MikroTik as well if the traffic is in the 1G
> range or so.
mikrotik support for ipv6 is still dodgy: recursive next-hop is not
supported in bgp/ipv6:
https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=123964#p610239
... and OSPFv3 routes with the local-addre
>Arista DCS-7280SRA-48C6 is a 1ru box.??
>
>Has a nominally million route fib, Jericho+ 8GB of packet buffer.
>control-plane is 8GB of ram andAMD GX-424CC SOC which is 4 core 2.4ghz.
>We do direct fib injection with bird rather than the arista bgpd but the
>control-plane is capable of m
On 11/30/17 11:17, Ken Chase wrote:
> Back to this discussion! :) Arista as a viable full-table PE router. Was
> hoping
> for better experience reports since last mention.
>
> To make the Q bit more general, are there any PE routers yet that can handle
> 3-8
> full feeds and use an amp and 1U or
Thx. Rather steer clear of microtik for now however.
Guess I shoulda mentioned a baseline 10G capability at least on 4 sfp+ ports
(I know there's some 2port Microtiks too). Everyone's got gig-to-the-home now,
I can't see how anyone plans 1G PE builds anymore. They'll be obsolete by the
time they'r
On 2017-11-30 19:36, Romeo Czumbil wrote:
So I've been using Arista as layer2 for quite some time, and I'm pretty happy
with them.
Kicking the idea around to turn on some Layer3 features but I've been hearing
some negative feedback.
The people that I did hear negative feedback don't use Arista
> On Nov 30, 2017, at 2:17 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
>
> Back to this discussion! :) Arista as a viable full-table PE router. Was
> hoping
> for better experience reports since last mention.
>
> To make the Q bit more general, are there any PE routers yet that can handle
> 3-8
> full feeds and us
Back to this discussion! :) Arista as a viable full-table PE router. Was hoping
for better experience reports since last mention.
To make the Q bit more general, are there any PE routers yet that can handle 3-8
full feeds and use an amp and 1U or so instead of 5 and 4U? Or we're ito
whitebox/
ope
For Enterprise/DC, it works great. For service provider, they're not 100%
yet. The main issue is going to be around VRFs, as there's no interaction
between them (at least in the code version I'm on, that may have changed
recently or be changing soon). They'll work great as a P-Router, but if you
ne
35 matches
Mail list logo
