So is it recommended now to go over all the NGN core routers and restore them
to default with: no lawful-intercept disable cmd? :)
adam
On Dec 5, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> Agreed that the ITU-T is a membership organization, but the Questions and
> Study Group work programs are open to view (Q. 17/13 specifically covers DPI,
> and has more documents coming down the pipe). If you want to follow some
> Question you can
On Dec 5, 2012, at 15:07 , Tom Taylor wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 2:11 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> On 2012-12-05 14:01, Tom Taylor wrote:
>>> I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as "negotiated
>>> behind closed doors". Any drafts were available to all participants in
>>> the ITU-T, on
On 05/12/2012 2:11 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2012-12-05 14:01, Tom Taylor wrote:
I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as "negotiated
behind closed doors". Any drafts were available to all participants in
the ITU-T, on exactly the same terms as drafts of other Recommendations.
As
On Dec 5, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as "negotiated behind
> closed doors". Any drafts were available to all participants in the ITU-T, on
> exactly the same terms as drafts of other Recommendations. As an example, the
> draft co
Perhaps because you are addressing to a bunch of Internet engineers
that (we) are used to create standards in open forums where everybody
have a say.
For the new Internet world "available to all participants in the ITU-T,
on exactly the same terms as drafts of other Recommendation
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as "negotiated behind
> closed doors". Any drafts were available to all participants in the ITU-T,
> on exactly the same terms as drafts of other Recommendations. As an example,
> the draft comi
I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as "negotiated
behind closed doors". Any drafts were available to all participants in
the ITU-T, on exactly the same terms as drafts of other Recommendations.
As an example, the draft coming out of the October, 2011 meeting can be
seen at http
8 matches
Mail list logo
