Re: Radware vs Arbor

2013-09-27 Thread Steve
deployment. -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:05:36 +0200 From: Fabien Delmotte To: Tempest Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Radware vs Arbor Message-ID: <6de5c148-f65b-4894-a

Re: Radware vs Arbor

2013-09-27 Thread Fabien Delmotte
Hi, Maybe you can see what A10 Networks is doing. They build a new product dedicated to DDOS. Regards Fabien Le 26 sept. 2013 à 18:47, Tempest a écrit : > Doing a bunch of research, and I can't find a meaningful comparison of > these two products. Work for a carrier, and I am looking at imp

Re: Radware vs Arbor

2013-09-26 Thread dennis
modes. -- From: "Beavis" Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 3:57 PM To: "Tempest" Cc: Subject: Re: Radware vs Arbor For a DDoS solution; my experience leans on arbor's peakflow and their partnership with other upstream

Re: Radware vs Arbor

2013-09-26 Thread Beavis
For a DDoS solution; my experience leans on arbor's peakflow and their partnership with other upstream carrier's (Level3, Peer1, etc.) which makes sense since most of the attacks are distributed having recon work done by an organization like arbor makes you only worry about the attack types that co

Radware vs Arbor

2013-09-26 Thread Tempest
Doing a bunch of research, and I can't find a meaningful comparison of these two products. Work for a carrier, and I am looking at implementing a DDoS mitigation service that we can sell to our customers. Radware is cheaper, but I am seeing a lot of noise in various forums that makes me question