A10 is in pretty early stages right now on DDoS , this may be a good thing if you have time to wait and can help mold them a bit. They are still mostly enterprise focused , not really carrier grade . Radware is a little further along, but Arbor is king when it comes suitability for a carrier deployment.
________________________________ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:05:36 +0200 From: Fabien Delmotte <fdelmot...@mac.com> To: Tempest <tempestter...@gmail.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Radware vs Arbor Message-ID: <6de5c148-f65b-4894-a13e-80e13a93a...@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi, Maybe you can see what A10 Networks is doing. They build a new product dedicated to DDOS. Regards Fabien Le 26 sept. 2013 ? 18:47, Tempest <tempestter...@gmail.com> a ?crit : > Doing a bunch of research, and I can't find a meaningful comparison of > these two products. Work for a carrier, and I am looking at implementing a > DDoS mitigation service that we can sell to our customers. Radware is > cheaper, but I am seeing a lot of noise in various forums that makes me > question their viability for what we need. Arbor has most of the market, > and I assume there is good reason for it. Both companies seem to be very > deceptive about how they compare to the other. Anyone out there with good > hands on experience that can compare? Not interested in input from either > company, we get plenty of that already. Good experience, or links to good > write ups would be excellent... > > Davis B. End of NANOG Digest, Vol 68, Issue 80 *************************************
