Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-30 Thread Elmar K. Bins
Re, meh...@akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin) wrote: > > But all the traffic on every Equinix and PAIX switch combined, is still > > lower than the traffic on any one of the three large exchanges in Europe. > > It really is all about the PNIs. > I wonder how is NOTA like, do they ever make the traffic i

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-29 Thread Mehmet Akcin
On Nov 29, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > Even combined, no. It's north of 700 Gbps though. I am assuming they have > combined S&D into the graph, though: > > > > Given that Any2 is in the 200 range, Equinix is cle

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-29 Thread Fredy Kuenzler
Am 29.11.2010 20:44, schrieb Richard A Steenbergen: Uhh... Reality check, with the S&D acquisition Equinix controls the VAST majority of the IX traffic in the US. [...] I was actually quite surprised that, when the merger of Equinix and S&D was announced, no competition commission woke up and r

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-29 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Nov 29, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:03:21PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: >> The only thing I would change is that Any2 has at least one exchange >> with traffic (Los Angeles) and is distributed throughout the country. >> >> But the vast major

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-29 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:03:21PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > The only thing I would change is that Any2 has at least one exchange > with traffic (Los Angeles) and is distributed throughout the country. > > But the vast majority of traffic exchange over IXes in the US is over > Equinix/P

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-29 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Nov 29, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:09:55PM -0600, Aaron Wendel wrote: >>> According to pch they don't run most of them. I would say they run >>> very few compared to how many there actually a

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-29 Thread Bill Woodcock
On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:09:55PM -0600, Aaron Wendel wrote: >> According to pch they don't run most of them. I would say they run >> very few compared to how many there actually are. > > Uhh... Reality check, with the S&D acquisiti

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-29 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:09:55PM -0600, Aaron Wendel wrote: > According to pch they don't run most of them. I would say they run > very few compared to how many there actually are. Uhh... Reality check, with the S&D acquisition Equinix controls the VAST majority of the IX traffic in the US. T

RE: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-28 Thread Ryan Finnesey
I was getting my info from peeringdb I have not yet looked into PCH yet. From: Aaron Wendel [mailto:aa...@wholesaleinternet.net] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:10 PM To: Ryan Finnesey; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: experience with equinix exchange According to pch they don't run most of

RE: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-28 Thread Aaron Wendel
eorge Bonser [mailto:gbon...@seven.com] Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 4:48 AM To: Ryan Finnesey Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: experience with equinix exchange I haven't had any specific problems with them but they are a bit retentive when it comes to doing certain things. There w

RE: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-28 Thread Ryan Finnesey
[mailto:gbon...@seven.com] Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 4:48 AM To: Ryan Finnesey Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: experience with equinix exchange I haven't had any specific problems with them but they are a bit retentive when it comes to doing certain things. There was the RMA module that ar

RE: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-20 Thread George Bonser
> I have found that you can (if you call the NOC rather than using their > portal) explain "We're expecting a whole lot of stuff from the > following > vendors over the next days." and that works just fine for the > shipping ticket problem when you're building out a new facility. And that is exac

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-20 Thread Owen DeLong
inal Message- >> From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com] >> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 7:42 PM >> To: Robert E. Seastrom; Justin Horstman >> Cc: Mehmet Akcin; nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: RE: experience with equinix exchange >&g

RE: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-20 Thread George Bonser
e- > From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com] > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 7:42 PM > To: Robert E. Seastrom; Justin Horstman > Cc: Mehmet Akcin; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: RE: experience with equinix exchange > > I would like to know the issues as well

RE: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-19 Thread Ryan Finnesey
Subject: Re: experience with equinix exchange Paul is pretty clueful; I think he was asking for specifics as to what the layer 8/9 issues are at Equinix, rather than an explanation of what layer 8 and 9 means. "Fly Fast", -r Justin Horstman writes: > 8 users > 9 polit

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-19 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
e- >> From: Paul WALL [mailto:pauldotw...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:55 AM >> To: Mehmet Akcin >> Cc: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: Re: experience with equinix exchange >> >> What are the layer 8-9 issues? >> >>

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-18 Thread Steve Miller
politics, finance... On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Paul WALL wrote: > What are the layer 8-9 issues? > > Drive Slow, > Paul Wall > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: > > > > On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote: > > > >> Has anyone had any experience (g

RE: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-18 Thread Justin Horstman
8 users 9 politics and policies > -Original Message- > From: Paul WALL [mailto:pauldotw...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:55 AM > To: Mehmet Akcin > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: experience with equinix exchange > > What are the layer 8-9

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-18 Thread Paul WALL
What are the layer 8-9 issues? Drive Slow, Paul Wall On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: > > On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote: > >> Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at any of >> their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? W

Re: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-17 Thread Mehmet Akcin
On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote: > Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at any of > their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering if people > really love or hate it. > > -shac Equinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however t