Re: email spam

2022-08-29 Thread Nick Boyce
> especially as it's *known* that email is not a reliable method of > communication That's the problem - it is *not* known by most ordinary folks that email is not reliable. They all think it *is* reliable. Nick On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 17:34, Anne Mitchell wrote: > > > > > On Aug 23, 2022, at

Re: email spam

2022-08-24 Thread Anne Mitchell
> On Aug 23, 2022, at 8:52 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian > wrote: > > If you have something business critical, let alone anything that affects > child safety, pick up a phone and call, or send an officer over to the school. 100%. Belt and suspender approach. If between 2020 and 2022 any chil

Legal notices being tagged as spam (was Re: email spam)

2022-08-24 Thread Anne Mitchell
> On Aug 23, 2022, at 7:33 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > Hello, > > To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we > say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems, > consider the risk: > > https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/08/23/fairfa

Re: email spam

2022-08-24 Thread Matthew Petach
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:28 AM Jawaid Bazyar wrote: > "flawlessly map IP address to GPS coordinates" Thanks, I needed a good hearty belly laugh to start off the day today. ;P *hint* It's easier to fix the spam problem than it is to map IP addresses to physical locations in reality-land. Thi

Re: email spam

2022-08-24 Thread Jawaid Bazyar
Simple solution: create a system that can flawlessly map IP address to GPS coordinates, then just nuke the spammers from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. Then the rest of us don't have to filter out emails. On 8/23/22, 11:19 PM, "NANOG on behalf of b...@theworld.com" wrote: They sh

Re: email spam

2022-08-24 Thread Tom Beecher
have the right setup in place to avoid ending up in spam and also ensure >> they are following up in some form, especially when its to do with child >> safety. >> >> >> >> - Jeremy >> >> >> >> *From:* NANOG *On >> Behalf Of *Suresh Ramasubra

Re: email spam

2022-08-23 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:50:22PM -0700, Jay Hennigan wrote: > On 8/23/22 18:33, William Herrin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we > > say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems, > > Sigh. They are substantiall

Re: email spam

2022-08-23 Thread Crist Clark
o do with child > safety. > > > > - Jeremy > > > > *From:* NANOG *On > Behalf Of *Suresh Ramasubramanian > *Sent:* Wednesday, 24 August 2022 12:52 PM > *To:* Eric Tykwinski > *Cc:* nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* Re: email spam > > > > *[External Sender] Be

Re: email spam

2022-08-23 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 8/23/22 18:33, William Herrin wrote: Hello, To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems, Sigh. They are substantially less zealous about preventing spam from leaving their systems. -- Jay Hennig

Re: email spam

2022-08-23 Thread bzs
They should demand a full refund. On August 23, 2022 at 18:33 b...@herrin.us (William Herrin) wrote: > Hello, > > To folks at places like Google and Godaddy which have gotten, shall we > say, overzealous about preventing spam from entering their systems, > consider the risk: > > https:/

RE: email spam

2022-08-23 Thread Jeremy Chequer
afety. - Jeremy From: NANOG On Behalf Of Suresh Ramasubramanian Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2022 12:52 PM To: Eric Tykwinski Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: email spam [External Sender] Be cautious of any links or attachments within this email as it has come from an External Sender. 100%.

Re: email spam

2022-08-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
, August 24, 2022 8:14:16 AM To: Suresh Ramasubramanian Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: email spam Sorry about the bad examples, but I remember contacting both about issues with SPF multiple times. They both have seemed have to fixed things at least searching my logs for the last week. Most of

Re: email spam

2022-08-23 Thread Eric Tykwinski
Sorry about the bad examples, but I remember contacting both about issues with SPF multiple times. They both have seemed have to fixed things at least searching my logs for the last week. Most of my customers have had to whitelist them though for past issues. It’s also ezpassnj.com for the NJ

Re: email spam

2022-08-23 Thread Eric Tykwinski
Bill, Not only that, did they even follow their own rules, I’ve been fighting with septa.org, the Pennsylvania train authority, and easypassnj.com, the New Jersey transit toll collectors about invalid SPF records for years, and they literally don’t give a shit. If they say to put it in spam, w

Re: email spam

2022-08-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Without saying why the mail was blocked (dumb content filter looking for porn? a spamhaus listing because the police server was hacked? something else?) that’s not going to help too much. I’ve been spam filtering stuff at large providers since the late 90s and it never gets any easier to block