> especially as it's *known* that email is not a reliable method of > communication
That's the problem - it is *not* known by most ordinary folks that email is not reliable. They all think it *is* reliable. Nick On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 17:34, Anne Mitchell <amitch...@isipp.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 23, 2022, at 8:52 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.li...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > If you have something business critical, let alone anything that affects > > child safety, pick up a phone and call, or send an officer over to the > > school. > > 100%. Belt and suspender approach. If between 2020 and 2022 any child was > actually harmed by the guy, their parents are going to have a good lawsuit > (which sucks, because it would be much better to have no harmed child, of > course, but in my _academic_ opinion (i.e. this is not legal advice) the PD > was really, *really* negligent here, especially as it's *known* that email is > not a reliable method of communication, and if you aren't requiring an > acknowledgement that's on *you*). > > -- > Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law > CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy > Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) > Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook > Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange > Dean Emeritus, Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School > Prof. Emeritus, Lincoln Law School > Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop > Counsel Emeritus, eMail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) >
