On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
>> Is H.264 Turing-complete ? Is Ogg-Vorbis ? (It seems like those are
>> the two reasonable open standard choices.))
>
> Okay by me. Just no "Flash Video Streams" if you please.
what about html5?
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> () ascii ribbon campaign against html e-mail
> /\ www.asciiribbon.org
>
>
> > On Thursday, 05 January, 2012 08:30, Marshall Eubanks said:
>
> > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> > > > There is video
ion macros of any type).
> >
> > ;)
> >
> > ---
> > () ascii ribbon campaign against html e-mail
> > /\ www.asciiribbon.org
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
> &
iribbon.org
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 04 January, 2012 20:47
>> To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
>> Cc: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com; Wessels, Duane; nanog@nanog.org
>> Su
-Original Message-
> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 04 January, 2012 20:47
> To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> Cc: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com; Wessels, Duane; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org
>
> On Wed, Jan
Mike
On Jan 4, 2012, at 7:47 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> wrote:
>
>>> Err, while we're talking about video files and nanog, why is the video
>>> content still served off (stored content I mean) nanog.org servers?
>>> Why not use
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost
wrote:
>> Err, while we're talking about video files and nanog, why is the video
>> content still served off (stored content I mean) nanog.org servers?
>> Why not use one of the many video serving services? some of which are
>> free even
On Jan 4, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> wrote:
>
>> There was a single source IP with 200+ open, active http connections to a
>> single large media file. The single IP address was blocked. The file
>> itself is stil
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost
wrote:
> There was a single source IP with 200+ open, active http connections to a
> single large media file. The single IP address was blocked. The file itself
> is still available on the site.
oh! so the 200 or so users on tulip.net
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Hallgren [mailto:m.hallg...@free.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:11 PM
> To: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
> Cc: Wessels, Duane; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org
>
> Le mercredi 04 ja
Le mercredi 04 janvier 2012 à 20:18 +, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:10:13PM -0500, George, Wes wrote:
> > > From: Wessels, Duane [mailto:dwess...@verisign.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:41 PM
> > >
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:10:13PM -0500, George, Wes wrote:
> > From: Wessels, Duane [mailto:dwess...@verisign.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org
> >
> >
> > The brief problem in accessi
> From: Wessels, Duane [mailto:dwess...@verisign.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org
>
>
> The brief problem in accessing www.nanog.org was due to numerous
> parallel
> downloads of a large video file by a singl
The brief problem in accessing www.nanog.org was due to numerous parallel
downloads of a large video file by a single source IP address. We have
no reason to believe it was malicious in intent, but the offender has been
blocked anyway.
Anyone from AS37986 around?
Duane W.
Works for me as well :> I will check to see if there was some interruption
in service and report as warranted.
Betty
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> works for me
>
>
>
--
Betty Burke
NewNOG/NANOG Executive Director
Office (810) 214-1218
Direct (510) 492-4030
I was seeing the same problem, but it seems to be working now.
On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> works for me
>
>
works for me
17 matches
Mail list logo
