anuary 10, 2017 11:52 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org; 'baldur.nordd...@gmail.com'
> Subject: RE: Soliciting your opinions on Internet routing: A survey on BGP
> convergence
>
> Hi Baldur,
>
> Have you tried graceful shutdown?
> You need redundant links, but not to the
Hi Joel,
> On 10 Jan 2017, at 06:51, joel jaeggli wrote:
>
> On 1/9/17 2:56 PM, Laurent Vanbever wrote:
>> Hi NANOG,
>>
>> We often read that the Internet (i.e. BGP) is "slow to converge". But how
>> slow
>> is it really? Do you care anyway? And can we (researchers) do anything about
>> it?
>
Dear Baldur,
> I find that the type of outage that affects our network the most is neither
> of the two options you describe. As is probably typical for smaller networks,
> we do not have redundant uplinks to all of our transits. If a transit link
> goes, for example because we had to reboot a
On 10 January 2017 at 19:58, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 03:51:04AM +0100, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>> If a transit link goes, for example because we had to reboot a router,
>> traffic is supposed to reroute to the remaining transit links.
>> Internally our network handles this fai
> On Jan 10, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
>
>
> On Tue 2017-Jan-10 20:58:02 +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 03:51:04AM +0100, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>>> If a transit link goes, for example because we had to reboot a router,
>>> traffic is supposed to reroute
On Tue 2017-Jan-10 20:58:02 +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 03:51:04AM +0100, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
If a transit link goes, for example because we had to reboot a router,
traffic is supposed to reroute to the remaining transit links.
Internally our network handles this fai
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 03:51:04AM +0100, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> If a transit link goes, for example because we had to reboot a router,
> traffic is supposed to reroute to the remaining transit links.
> Internally our network handles this fairly fast for egress traffic.
>
> However the problem is
Hi Baldur,
Have you tried graceful shutdown?
You need redundant links, but not to the same transit.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-06
This draft is expired, but it is actually implemented by several vendors.
I implemented this.
http://www.slideshare.net/bduvivie/bgp-gracefu
On 1/9/17 2:56 PM, Laurent Vanbever wrote:
> Hi NANOG,
>
> We often read that the Internet (i.e. BGP) is "slow to converge". But how slow
> is it really? Do you care anyway? And can we (researchers) do anything about
> it?
> Please help us out to find out by answering our short anonymous survey
Hello
I find that the type of outage that affects our network the most is
neither of the two options you describe. As is probably typical for
smaller networks, we do not have redundant uplinks to all of our
transits. If a transit link goes, for example because we had to reboot a
router, traff
10 matches
Mail list logo
