--On onsdag, onsdag 4 feb 2009 19.02.56 -0500 "Patrick W. Gilmore"
wrote:
> Second, where did you get 4 users per /64? Are you planning to hand each
> cable modem a /64?
Telia got their /20 based on calculations where they give every customer a
/48. Every apartment in every highrise gets 2^16 n
On 5/02/2009, at 3:09 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
TJ wrote:
No, we should hand each home a /56 (or perhaps a /48, for the
purists out
there) - allowing for multiple segments (aka subnet, aka links,
etc.).
If there are, say, 250-500 million broadband services in the world
(probably more)
>Has anyone done some analysis of what this might look like? Especially
with growth etc.
Sure, probably lots of people lots of times.
Off the top of my head, using some current/common allocations sizes:
Current "Global Unicast" space --> 2000::/3
An "average" RIR --> /12
a
TJ wrote:
No, we should hand each home a /56 (or perhaps a /48, for the purists out
there) - allowing for multiple segments (aka subnet, aka links, etc.).
If there are, say, 250-500 million broadband services in the world
(probably more) then, if every ISP followed best practise for IPv6
addr
TJ wrote:
>> Some devices will refuse to work if you subnet smaller than a /64. (Yes,
>> poorly designed, etc.)
>
> Actually, no - not poorly designed. The spec says it must be a /64
> (excluding those starting with 000 binary) so that is what devices
> (rightfully) expect. Ref: http://tools.
>Some devices will refuse to work if you subnet smaller than a /64. (Yes,
>poorly designed, etc.)
Actually, no - not poorly designed. The spec says it must be a /64 (excluding
those starting with 000 binary) so that is what devices (rightfully) expect.
Ref: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Except the RIRs won't give you another /48 when you have only used
>>> one trillion IP addresses.
>>
>> Of course they will! A /48 is only the equivalent of 65536 "networks"
>> (each network being a /64). Presuming that ISPs a
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:56:44 -0800, Scott Howard wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:30 PM,
> Anthony Roberts wrote:
>
>> It has been my experience that when you give someone a huge address
space
>> to play with (eg 10/8), they start doing things like using bits in the
>> address as flags for thing
> > IPv4-style utilization ratios do make some sense under IPv6, but not
> > at the
> > address level - only at the network level.
>
> First, it was (mostly) a joke.
>
> Second, where did you get 4 users per /64? Are you planning to hand
> each cable modem a /64?
>
At the least. Some would sa
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Except the RIRs won't give you another /48 when you have only used one
>>> trillion IP addresses.
>>
>> Of course they will! A /48 is only the equivale
On Feb 4, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore
wrote:
Except the RIRs won't give you another /48 when you have only used
one
trillion IP addresses.
Of course they will! A /48 is only the equivalent of 65536
"networks" (each
network be
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Anthony Roberts wrote:
> It has been my experience that when you give someone a huge address space
> to play with (eg 10/8), they start doing things like using bits in the
> address as flags for things. Suddenly you find yourself using a prefix
> that should enough
12 matches
Mail list logo
