On 12/14/2012 11:11 PM, eric-l...@truenet.com wrote:
It's been about 2 years in since I've heard about the concept, and honestly
I'm about ready to jump into test environments at my house. My questions
are pretty basic, what distro would you recommend for a controller, and
should I start by virtu
I'm biased, but I'd say give cloudstack a try. Supports openflow, and
fairly easy to spin up.
http://www.slideshare.net/xen_com_mgr/under-the-hood-open-vswitch-openflow-in-xcp-xenserver
John
On Dec 14, 2012, at 8:13 PM, "eric-l...@truenet.com"
wrote:
> It's been about 2 years in since I've hear
On Dec 14, 2012 8:47 PM, "Jeff Kell" wrote:
>
> Yeah, it's the neatest thing since sliced bread, but requires layer-2
> connectivity across the board. When you exhaust your mac address
> tables, we'll welcome you back to the real world.
I think you are confusing vendor solutions with a protocol.
On 12/14/2012 11:11 PM, eric-l...@truenet.com wrote:
> It's been about 2 years in since I've heard about the concept, and honestly
> I'm about ready to jump into test environments at my house. My questions
> are pretty basic, what distro would you recommend for a controller, and
> should I start
I wonder if this will be contributed to the DC (DataCenter) work
currently gearing up in the IETF.
Regards
Marshall
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/04/going-with-the-flow-google/all/1
>
> Going With The Flow: Google’s Secret Swit
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:45:59
To: Matlock, Kenneth L
Cc:
Subject: Re: OpenFlow
On 2010-09-24 23:41, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
> Which is fine and all (being that it's on-topic). My main beef is that a
> certain person can't take a hint. Using an 'anonymous' re-mailer t
On 9/24/10 3:10 PM, nanogf . wrote:
Guillaume FORTAINE
Tel : +33(0)631092519
Mail : gforta...@gfortaine.biz
GO AWAY FORTAINE!
Geeze, do some people never take the hint?
--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org/ http://www.ahbl.org
On 2010-09-24 23:41, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
> Which is fine and all (being that it's on-topic). My main beef is that a
> certain person can't take a hint. Using an 'anonymous' re-mailer to try
> and get people to read nothing more than copy/paste, and then 5 billion
> 'references' (most of which
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlo...@exempla.org
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jer...@unfix.org]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 3:31 PM
To: Matlock, Kenneth L
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: OpenFlow
On 2010-09-24 23:25, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
> Wow, re
It could be because his dumb ass got the banhammer from nanog
Mods: can you plase get rid of him again?
Tammy
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen Massar
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:30:55
To: Matlock, Kenneth L
Cc:
Subject: Re: OpenFlow
On 2010
There is another related item planned for NANOG50:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog50/abstracts.php?pt=MTYzNSZuYW5vZzUw&nm=nanog50
-
An Open-Source Interoperable MPLS LSR
Scott Whyte, Google
Presentation Date: October 4, 2010, 1
On 2010-09-24 23:25, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
> Wow, resorting to using a spoofed email address to propagate your spam,
> and forget to remove your .sig
>
> Some people just don't take a hint, do they? I know which software
> package I WON'T be recommending to anyone (in fact, quite the opposite!
Wow, resorting to using a spoofed email address to propagate your spam,
and forget to remove your .sig
Some people just don't take a hint, do they? I know which software
package I WON'T be recommending to anyone (in fact, quite the opposite!)
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 4
13 matches
Mail list logo
