On 10/26/2015 03:17 PM, Larry Blunk wrote:
As Job Snijders (a fellow Communications Committee member) noted
in an earlier post, we will be implementing some additional protection
mechanisms to prevent this style of incident from happening again. We
will be more aggressively moderating posts fr
Thank you Larry and Job for the responses, mitigation steps taken, and work to
further resolve these kind of events.
Food for thought for the rest of us out there. Had there been a network attack
on Sunday (for example) and several of these lists (multiple received this spam
"attack") were sw
Thank you team
On Monday, October 26, 2015, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:17:37PM -0400, Larry Blunk wrote:
> >Just wanted to apologize for the attack over the weekend. The
> > posts came from a email address that was subscribed to the list, so
> > it was not subjected to
On 10/26/2015 3:00 PM, Job Snijders wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:17:37PM -0400, Larry Blunk wrote:
Just wanted to apologize for the attack over the weekend. The
posts came from a email address that was subscribed to the list, so
it was not subjected to moderation. While a filter was a
Larry,
Thank you for the work you and others do behind the scenes to make
the nanog list available and functional.
Mike-
On 10/26/2015 12:17 PM, Larry Blunk wrote:
All,
Just wanted to apologize for the attack over the weekend. The
posts came from a email address that was subscribe
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:17:37PM -0400, Larry Blunk wrote:
>Just wanted to apologize for the attack over the weekend. The
> posts came from a email address that was subscribed to the list, so
> it was not subjected to moderation. While a filter was added
> to block further posts (which were
6 matches
Mail list logo
