Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-22 Thread Brad Fleming
We also enjoyed a large multicast stream -- we selected the one provided by Northwestern University's retransmission of C-SPAN's coverage. We consumed the stream via KanREN's link to The Great Plains Network (our Internet2 connector). If anyone is on the list from Northwestern University: T

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-21 Thread James Pleger
Arbor had a good writeup on the traffic that they saw. http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2009/01/the-great-obama-traffic-flood/ Regards, James Pleger On Jan 21, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Ong Beng Hui wrote: Is there a general study done on the overall impact of inauguration streaming traffic ? any

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-21 Thread Ong Beng Hui
Is there a general study done on the overall impact of inauguration streaming traffic ? any summary on what is the overall gain of bandwidth, etc.

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-21 Thread Jim Popovitch
Interesting read on yesterday's streaming. My experiences seem to mirror a lot of what is written here: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/21/the-day-live-web-video-streaming-failed-us/ -Jim P.

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-21 Thread Brandon Butterworth
> The Beeb's HD multicast feed is about 23Mbit/s to the host, and we received > it at quite decent (subjective) quality here on a JANET-connected university > site. This is full broadcast HD, exactly the same as we have on satellite. We don't consider it generally usable, it's part of IPTV serv

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-21 Thread Tim Chown
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:38:11PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Brian Wallingford wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Jay Hennigan wrote: > > > > :We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing > > :almost double our normal downstream traffic

RE: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Frank Bulk
During the inauguration our traffic was higher than normal, but levels only reached our average daily peak. More specifically, we climbed to our average daily peak earlier than normal, and it stayed at a sustained rate, but it didn't break any records here. Frank -Original Message- From:

RE: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread John van Oppen
indicated. It was a good advertisement for having spare capacity handy. John van Oppen Spectrum Networks LLC / AS11404 -Original Message- From: Scott Weeks [mailto:sur...@mauigateway.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:28 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Inauguration

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Paul Wall
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Ren Provo wrote: > BitGravity did a great job. Nearly every major CDN or web host was involved with the inauguration in some manner, with no reported issues to speak of. Some "facilities-based" providers even placed infrastructure with their competitors to be ex

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Marcello Azambuja
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Jeff Kell wrote: > > Mostly udp/8247 for the streaming (CNN). But oddly enough, for a given > client, more outbound traffic than inbound. Streaming gone peer-to-peer? > > Jeff CNN is using Octoshape's P2P plug-in with Flash. Marcello Azambuja

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Scott Weeks
--- j...@west.net wrote: --- From: Jay Hennigan We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else? Not much of a traffic boost here in Hawaii as it happened at 7

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Jeff Kell
Jay Hennigan wrote: > We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing > almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else? Yes, tres beaucoups. Mostly udp/8247 for the streaming (CNN). But oddly enough, for a given client, more outbound traffic than inbound.

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Elijah Savage
> > > > We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing > > almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone > else? > > > > -- > > Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net > > Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ > > Your

RE: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Eric Van Tol
> -Original Message- > From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:j...@west.net] > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:21 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Inauguration streaming traffic > > We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing > almost double our normal downstream traffic r

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Ryan Harden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We're seeing more TCP1935 than UDP8247. http://ct-mail.cites.uiuc.edu/~hardenrm/graphs/Peakflow-1.png /Ryan Harry Hoffman wrote: > Yep, most seems to be port 8247. Which seems to be CNN streaming > service. > > And yay for the p2p options now in fl

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Ren Provo
BitGravity did a great job. On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Christopher Morrow < morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > As an aside... thanks to BBC for streaming this, I couldn't find > another source that wasn't overloaded/jerky/ugly :( > > Thanks Brandon. > > -Chris > >

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Brian Wallingford wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Jay Hennigan wrote: > > :We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing > :almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else? > > We're seeing traffic levels nearly 2x normal. O

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Harry Hoffman
Yep, most seems to be port 8247. Which seems to be CNN streaming service. And yay for the p2p options now in flash... nothing like that to make it look like a comp'd system/attack. --Harry On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 12:24 -0500, Patrick Muldoon wrote: > On Jan 20, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Jay Hennigan wro

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Brian Wallingford
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Jay Hennigan wrote: :We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing :almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else? We're seeing traffic levels nearly 2x normal. On 9/11/01, we were probably only about 50% higher than the norm. Of c

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread David E. Smith
Jay Hennigan wrote: We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else? Ditto. I'm suddenly glad we paid for that "burstable" option :) David Smith MVN.net

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Patrick Muldoon
On Jan 20, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote: We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else? We are seeing about 150% increase in traffic as well. -Patrick -- Patrick Muldoon Network/Software Engi

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 12:20 PM 1/20/2009, Jay Hennigan wrote: We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else? Yes, close to double normal traffic here in south-west Ontario, Canada. ---Mike

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

2009-01-20 Thread Wayne E. Bouchard
Yes, pretty well everyone else. :-) On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 09:20:40AM -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote: > We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing > almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else? > > -- > Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering