You might want to consider 655 or 825 from Dlink and the Apple Airport
Extreme and Time Capsule. We have had a pretty
good experience with these models thus far.
John
=
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
e) mailto:john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com
o) 609-3
On 08/06/2011 22:58, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:48:52PM -0400, Joly MacFie wrote:
What seems evident, looking at
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a
lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn
quick!
I'd
4.
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:15 PM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn
Sent from my iPad
On 2011-06-08, at 5:09 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Matt Ryanczak"
>>
>>> Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabled but the user-agent on my phone
>>> denies me an IPv6 experience.
>>
>>
>
> Leslie Daigle and Vint Cerf are on the News Hour tonight about World IPv6
> Day. Watch it if you get a chance. They did a great job!
>
CJ
On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Matt Ryanczak"
>
>> Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabled but the user-agent on my phone
>> denies me an IPv6 experience.
>
> I thought I'd heard that LTE transport was *IPv6 only*...
you may have but it's wr
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:48:52PM -0400, Joly MacFie wrote:
> What seems evident, looking at
> http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a
> lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn
> quick!
I'd attribute that spike to "people active
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> What seems evident, looking at
> http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a
> lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn
> quick!
Or ... folks switched it on and then it switched i
What seems evident, looking at
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/06/monitoring-world-ipv6-day/ is that a
lot of folks switched it on - and then switched it off again pretty damn
quick!
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
W
red Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:15 PM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does
for others thou
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:22 58PM,
wrote:
> No issues connecting to FB for me on IPv6 (both to www.v6.facebook.com and to
> the returned by www.facebook.com now).
>
> Interesting (perhaps) side note - www.facebook.com has a , but
> "facebook.com" does not.
>
> Google / Youtube records
Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:15 PM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does
for others though
If you go to www.v6.facebook.com it
On 6/8/11 1:29 AM, Neil Long wrote:
>
> On 8 Jun 2011, at 02:13, TJ wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:04, Iljitsch van Beijnum
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
>>>
... and Gmail, too ...
>>>
>>> imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
>>>
>>
>> Good catch, applies to pop
I have a similar setting as Jamie, VZ Fios plus HE tunnel, except I am
running a FreeBSD VM to terminate tunnel and to run rtadvd. everything
works nicely, so I thought I could do some tests on IPv6 connectivity
and speed to China. There is a single-stack IPv6 website
(bt.neu6.edu.cn) hosted by a c
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:09 AM
> To: Williams, Marcus (Contractor)
> Cc: Tim Chown; NANOG list
> Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Williams, Marcus (Contractor) wrote:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >&
On 2011-Jun-08 16:09, Owen DeLong wrote:
[..]
> World IPv6 day is today. It started at UTC June 8 and goes to
> just before UTC June 9. As I write this, there are approximately
> 10 hours remaining in world IPv6 day.
I think it is quite obvious that nothing serious broke anywhere ;)
(rea
>
> The AUD prices include all taxes. That being said one can still
> buy retail in the states including taxes, add shipping and come out
> in front for a identical product. 3x markup is a rip-off.
>
No argument here, but, as I'm in the states...
The worst tax rate I know in the US is Californ
On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Williams, Marcus (Contractor) wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tim Chown [mailto:t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:32 AM
>> I had to flush my MacOS X DNS cache before I'd get the
>> new record.
>
>
> World IPv6 Day will be to
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Mark Andrews wrote:
The AUD prices include all taxes. That being said one can still buy
retail in the states including taxes, add shipping and come out in front
for a identical product. 3x markup is a rip-off.
Swedish prices are approximately equivalent of 110USD for the
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Chown [mailto:t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:32 AM
> I had to flush my MacOS X DNS cache before I'd get the
> new record.
World IPv6 Day will be tomorrow.
Marcus Williams
In message , Owen DeLong
writes:
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >=20
> > In message , Owen =
> DeLong write
> > s:
> >>=20
> >> On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >>=20
> >>> =3D20
> >>> In message =3D
> >> >>> .us>, John van Oppen writes:
> I was w
Just FWIW:
US, Amazon, Dlink, DIR615, $35.45 ...
/TJ
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 08:46, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message , Owen DeLong
> write
> s:
> >
> > On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > >=20
> > > In message =
> > > > .us>, John van Oppen writes:
> > >> I was wondering
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message , Owen DeLong
> write
> s:
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>>> =20
>>> In message =
>> >> .us>, John van Oppen writes:
I was wondering the same thing... we have v6 enabled to about 700 =
>> users i=
On Jun 8, 2011, at 4:52 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2011-Jun-08 13:40, Jamie Bowden wrote:
>> Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
>> stack at home (well, mostly, like most folks, VZ gives me a single
>> address and I live behind that with NATv4, but otherwise, I
In message , Owen DeLong write
s:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >=20
> > In message =
> > .us>, John van Oppen writes:
> >> I was wondering the same thing... we have v6 enabled to about 700 =
> users i=3D
> >> n our native Ethernet to the home deployment here in Seat
TJ wrote:
>
> ... and Gmail, too ...
Except they are not relaying mail over v6.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
South Utsire: Variable 3 or 4, but in far southeast, easterly 5 at first and
becoming westerly 5 to 7 later. Slight or moderate. Rain then showers. Poor,
becoming good.
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: Harry Hoffman [mailto:hhoff...@ip-solutions.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:00 AM
To: Jamie Bowden; 'NANOG list'
Subject: RE: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
I have the same setup as you, except a Linux box that does the
firewalling.
The actiontec is
Message-
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jer...@unfix.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:52 AM
To: Jamie Bowden
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On 2011-Jun-08 13:40, Jamie Bowden wrote:
> Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
&g
top then you're potentially allowing the world to access that port.
Cheers,
Harry
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Bowden [mailto:ja...@photon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:40 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: RE: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I
On 2011-Jun-08 13:40, Jamie Bowden wrote:
> Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
> stack at home (well, mostly, like most folks, VZ gives me a single
> address and I live behind that with NATv4, but otherwise, I loves me
> some FiOS) and yesterday went by for me with
ses from that /64.
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:15 PM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> www.faceboo
On Jun 8, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
>
> On 8 Jun 2011, at 04:46, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>>
>> We have seen a traffic increase but nothing like what I was expecting, nay
>> hoping to see. (i.e.: gigs and gigs of traffic - it does look like ~2x to
>> me in an unscientific eye-look at a
That is one of the issues that I believe RIPE is capturing -- how many
dual-stacked sites have all their objects dual-stacked.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: David Hill [mailto:dh...@mindcry.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 12:10 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is
On 8 Jun 2011, at 04:46, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> We have seen a traffic increase but nothing like what I was expecting, nay
> hoping to see. (i.e.: gigs and gigs of traffic - it does look like ~2x to me
> in an unscientific eye-look at a chart).
Some of it may be down to client behaviour. De
On 8 Jun 2011, at 02:13, TJ wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:04, Iljitsch van Beijnum
wrote:
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
... and Gmail, too ...
imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
Good catch, applies to pop & smtp as well. Baby steps, I guess?
/TJ
Sadly, although I can co
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message
> .us>, John van Oppen writes:
>> I was wondering the same thing... we have v6 enabled to about 700 users i=
>> n our native Ethernet to the home deployment here in Seattle.Unfortunat=
>> ely, user routers don't seem to often
* Jay Ashworth (j...@baylink.com) wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Matt Ryanczak"
>
> > Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabled but the user-agent on my phone
> > denies me an IPv6 experience.
>
> I thought I'd heard that LTE transport was *IPv6 only*...
LTE supports both IPv4 and IPv
Some sites still require ipv4 to load properly (stylesheets, statics,
etc)
disable ipv4 on your machine and go to:
http://www.facebook.com
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/
http://www.yahoo.com/
I guess it is a start though.
In message , John van Oppen writes:
> I was wondering the same thing... we have v6 enabled to about 700 users i=
> n our native Ethernet to the home deployment here in Seattle.Unfortunat=
> ely, user routers don't seem to often support v6 resulting in only about 2-=
> 8% of users in most bui
list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
Thanks for the link Jared.
I wonder how many eye-balls are really enabled to reach the IPv6
sites. Akamai's site doesn't show very impressive numbers, trying to
figure why 300ms latency and >4% packet loss ?
-J
On Jun 7, 2011, at 11:31 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> Thanks for the link Jared.
>
> I wonder how many eye-balls are really enabled to reach the IPv6
> sites. Akamai's site doesn't show very impressive numbers, trying to
> figure why 300ms latency and >4% packet loss ?
My guess is it's over the e
Thanks for the link Jared.
I wonder how many eye-balls are really enabled to reach the IPv6
sites. Akamai's site doesn't show very impressive numbers, trying to
figure why 300ms latency and >4% packet loss ?
-J
I'm observing our netflow of the ipv6 address-family from nodes where we're
capable. It's not that interesting actually. I've seen larger spikes than
what we're seeing [so far].
Akamai has a realtime IPv6 stats page as well here:
http://www.akamai.com/ipv6
You can check out the hits/second p
Anybody keeping any realtime stats ?
-J
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:04, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
>
> > ... and Gmail, too ...
>
> imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
>
Good catch, applies to pop & smtp as well. Baby steps, I guess?
/TJ
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:31, TJ wrote:
> ... and Gmail, too ...
imap.gmail.com only has IPv4, though.
Anyone with native v6 want to help me test my content? I don't have any v6
access from anything except a few dedicated servers yet. Off list response is
fine :)
-Original Message-
From: TJ [mailto:trej...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 6:32 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: IPv
That is expected, the CDN is not IPv6 enabled (yet)
On 6/7/11 5:24 PM, "Rémy Sanchez" wrote:
>On 06/08/2011 02:13 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>> I'm getting v6 for facebook now.
>
>www.facebook.com is v6 here, but I see no for the fbcdn.net
>subdomains.
>
>--
>Rémy Sanchez
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Matt Ryanczak"
> Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabled but the user-agent on my phone
> denies me an IPv6 experience.
I thought I'd heard that LTE transport was *IPv6 only*...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j..
- Original Message -
> From: "Jared Mauch"
> Props to google for doing it right, e.g.:
>
> maps.googleapis.com
> gg.google.com
> safebrowsing.clients.google.com
>
> Thank you google!
Funny you bring up "getting all the subsidiary sties right".
I tried to comment on an N
On 6/7/2011 17:16, Scott Howard wrote:
> That's because you're asking the wrong nameservers. The response you're
> getting is pointing you to the correct nameservers (glb1/glb2.facebook.com)
> which are defintely returning records for me :
>
> $ dig +short www.facebook.com @glb1.faceboo
Sorry about this.
When asked for the right thing it does resolv!
$ dig www.facebook.com
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.facebook.com. IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.facebook.com. 30 IN 2620:0:1c08:4000:face:b00c:0:3
> That's because you're asking th
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 20:14, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> Props to google for doing it right, e.g.:
>
> maps.googleapis.com
> gg.google.com
> safebrowsing.clients.google.com
>
> Thank you google!
>
> - Jared
>
... and Gmail, too ...
/TJ
On 06/08/2011 02:13 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> I'm getting v6 for facebook now.
www.facebook.com is v6 here, but I see no for the fbcdn.net subdomains.
--
Rémy Sanchez
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.juniper.net is on IPv6
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for others
though
Working great for me. Getting to it via HE.
www.level3.com works fine over v4 but shows a 404 over IPv6
Yes, I am seeing th
On 6/7/2011 7:13 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 6/7/2011 17:04, fredrik danerklint wrote:
This is from Sweden.
$ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
;<<>> DiG 9.7.3<<>> any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NO
On 06/07/2011 08:08 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I'm using my iPhone as the IPv6-only canary. www.facebook.com now seems to
work, but it redirects to m.facebook.com which doesn't have IPv6. This seems to
be a trend, yahoo and cnn do the same thing. Annoying.
Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabl
> On 8 jun 2011, at 2:02, Pete Carah wrote:
>
>> www.facebook.com (but not facebook.com) just turned on here too (after
>> google). another hex-speak spelling...
> I'm using my iPhone as the IPv6-only canary. www.facebook.com now seems to
> work, but it redirects to m.facebook.com which doesn't h
That's because you're asking the wrong nameservers. The response you're
getting is pointing you to the correct nameservers (glb1/glb2.facebook.com)
which are defintely returning records for me :
$ dig +short www.facebook.com @glb1.facebook.com
2620:0:1c08:4000:face:b00c:0:3
Scott.
On Jun 7, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 8 jun 2011, at 2:02, Pete Carah wrote:
>
>> www.facebook.com (but not facebook.com) just turned on here too (after
>> google). another hex-speak spelling...
>
> I'm using my iPhone as the IPv6-only canary. www.facebook.com now seems
I'm getting v6 for facebook now.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
- Original Message -
> This is from Sweden.
>
> $ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
>
> ; <<>> Di
On 6/7/2011 17:04, fredrik danerklint wrote:
> This is from Sweden.
>
> $ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61742
> ;; flags:
On 8 jun 2011, at 2:02, Pete Carah wrote:
> www.facebook.com (but not facebook.com) just turned on here too (after
> google). another hex-speak spelling...
I'm using my iPhone as the IPv6-only canary. www.facebook.com now seems to
work, but it redirects to m.facebook.com which doesn't have IPv6
I'll be watching this page probably.
http://www.worldipv6day.org/participants/
This is from Sweden.
$ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61742
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
;; WARN
On 06/07/2011 07:56 PM, Pete Carah wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 07:22 PM, john.herb...@usc-bt.com wrote:
>> No issues connecting to FB for me on IPv6 (both to www.v6.facebook.com and
>> to the returned by www.facebook.com now).
>>
>> Interesting (perhaps) side note - www.facebook.com has a , bu
uot; does not.
>
> Google / Youtube records are up and running nicely also.
>
> J.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:15 PM
> To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re
yahoo is already serving up the as well.
Thanks Igor!
Looking forward to seeing the traffic spike today :)
- Jared
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> www.juniper.net is on IPv6
>
> www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for
> others t
- Original Message -
> From: "John Herbert"
> No issues connecting to FB for me on IPv6 (both to www.v6.facebook.com
> and to the returned by www.facebook.com now).
>
> Interesting (perhaps) side note - www.facebook.com has a , but
> "facebook.com" does not.
And "thefacebook.co
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:19 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 6/7/2011 6:15 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>>
>>> www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for
>>> others though
>> If you go to www.v6.facebook.com it works, but
--Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:15 PM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> www.facebook.com has but doesn't loa
On 6/7/2011 6:15 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for others
though
If you go to www.v6.facebook.com it works, but it seems they have some problem
on their main site. I am seei
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> www.facebook.com has but doesn't load for me over IPv6, it does for
> others though
If you go to www.v6.facebook.com it works, but it seems they have some problem
on their main site. I am seeing some issues reaching them over IPv6
73 matches
Mail list logo
