, resources, and internal inertia
more of than not develop and grow networks that aren't BCP-friendly.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org]
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 3:40 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Fire, Power loss at Fisher Plaza in Seattle
Ver
On Jul 3, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
That's a great idea, use some lame Web 2.0 trend to communicate with
actual real life customers.
I would assume they figured it was better than just remaining silent.
Regards
Marshall
Jeff
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Marshall Eubanks
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 13:21 -0700, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
>
> >
> >Earth is a single point of failure, where is your backup site?
>
> [TLB:] Given that all my customers are on Earth, I don't need one if my
> customers also are "down".
Bad Day !
That's a great idea, use some lame Web 2.0 trend to communicate with
actual real life customers.
Jeff
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Jul 3, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Ben Carleton wrote:
>
>> Yes it was.
>>
>> On Jul 3, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
>>
>>> Wasn't
On Jul 3, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Ben Carleton wrote:
Yes it was.
On Jul 3, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
Wasn't Authorize.net affected by this? We received a support ticket
about why Authorize.net is down today (I don't know either, I don't
ask too many questions).
Authorize.net was fo
Power to some of the affected sections of the building has been restored via
existing onsite generators. The central power risers cannot be connected to
current generators in a timely manner due to excessive damage to the
electrical switching equipment (and those generators may still be in
standin
In a message written on Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 03:22:14PM -0400, Sean Donelan
wrote:
> Are you better off with a single "tier 4" data center, multiple
> "tier 1" data centers, or something in between?
It depends entirely on your dependency on connectivity.
One extreme is something like a Central O
Yes it was.
On Jul 3, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
Wasn't Authorize.net affected by this? We received a support ticket
about why Authorize.net is down today (I don't know either, I don't
ask too many questions).
Jeff
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes
wrote:
Earth
Wasn't Authorize.net affected by this? We received a support ticket
about why Authorize.net is down today (I don't know either, I don't
ask too many questions).
Jeff
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Earth is a single point of failure, where is your backup site?
>
>
>
>Earth is a single point of failure, where is your backup site?
[TLB:] Given that all my customers are on Earth, I don't need one if my
customers also are "down".
> Earth is a single point of failure, where is your backup site?
This reminds me of the 1996 thread about how MAE-East still had no
generator. Same topic, roughly, some of the same people (hi, Sean).
Sure, the line about the Earth SPOF is catchy, but in terms of more
likely scenarios: how many pe
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, William Herrin wrote:
There is a useful standard: ANSI/TIA-942. It offers specifications for
four tiers of data centers ranging from tier 1 (a basic data center
with no redundancy) to tier 4 (fully fault tolerant).
Are you better off with a single "tier 4" data center, multi
-Original Message-
From: Tomas L. Byrnes [mailto:t...@byrneit.net]
Sent: Fri 7/3/2009 10:20 AM
To: David Hubbard; NANOG list
Subject: RE: Fire, Power loss at Fisher Plaza in Seattle
This begs the question of what basic parameters should be for a "carrier
hotel" or co-lo.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
> This begs the question of what basic parameters should be for a
> "carrier hotel" or co-lo. [...] The old NEBS standards were too much
> of a straightjacket.
Tomas,
There is a useful standard: ANSI/TIA-942. It offers specifications for
four
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009415571_apwafisherpla
zafire1stldwritethru.html
-Original Message-
From: David Hubbard [mailto:dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com]
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 1:05 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: RE: Fire, Power loss at Fisher Plaza in Seattle
Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
> This begs the question of what basic parameters should be for a "carrier
> hotel" or co-lo.
>
> Given that we're getting designated "Critical Infrastructure", we'd
> getter start coming up with some, or we'll have them defined for us.
>
> The old NEBS standards were too m
is life in the current Internet: Overpromise, and Underdeliver.
>-Original Message-
>From: David Hubbard [mailto:dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com]
>Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 10:05 AM
>To: NANOG list
>Subject: RE: Fire, Power loss at Fisher Plaza in Seattle
>
>From: Seth Matt
Darren Bolding wrote:
>
> Interestingly, this building is also the production studios for several
> Seattle TV and radio stations.
>
> There is no ETA for resolution.
>
Apparently it took authorize.net with it, too:
http://twitter.com/authorizenet
~Seth
Multiple folks on Twitter who are in the area are reporting a 5-6 hour
ETA.
-Joe
--
Joe Richards
--
ipv4: http://www.disconformity.net [ 72.29.169.48/28 ]
ipv6: http://ipv6.disconformity.net [ 2001:48c0:1001:1::/64 ]
blog: http://www.mainlined.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
