The below problem was the motivation for this BGP improvement :
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria
-Original Message-
From: Pete Lumbis
Date: Friday, October 25, 2013 2:01 PM
To: JRC NOC
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: BGP failur
As a member of the support team for a vendor, I'll say this problem isn't
entirely unheard of. The CPU is in charge of local traffic and the BGP
session and some sort of hardware chip or ASIC is in charge of moving
packets through the device. If the hardware is misprogrammed it won't
properly forwa
--- courtneysm...@comcast.net wrote:
From: Courtney Smith
> From: JRC NOC
> Regrettably, during the outage our BGP session remained active and we
> continued receiving full routes from the affected AS. And our prefixes
> continued to be advertised at their border. However basically none of
On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:13 AM, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:40:34 -0400
> From: JRC NOC
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: BGP failure analysis and recommendations
> Message-ID:
> <5.1.0.14.0.20131023214304.0396e...@authsmtp.jensenresearch.com>
> Cont
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Um, how about, don't buy services from network providers that fail in this
way?
I suppose the question is: "how would you know that any particular
network had this failure mode?"
Ask detailed questions about how their network is architected. Do
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Brandon Ross wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:40 PM, JRC NOC
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Have we/they lost something important in the changeover to converged
>>> mutiprotocol networks?
>>> Is there a better way for us ed
her Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: October-23-13 11:06 PM
To: JRC NOC
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:40 PM, JRC NOC
wrote:
> Is this just an unavoidable issue with scaling large networks?
nope... sounds like (to me at least) t
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:40 PM, JRC NOC
wrote:
Have we/they lost something important in the changeover to converged
mutiprotocol networks?
Is there a better way for us edge networks to achieve IP resiliency in the
current environment?
sadly I
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:40 PM, JRC NOC
wrote:
> Is this just an unavoidable issue with scaling large networks?
nope... sounds like (to me at least) the forwarding plane and control
plane are non-congruent in your provider's network :( so as you said,
if the forwarding-plane is dorked up betwee
9 matches
Mail list logo
