ip access-list e no-nanog-bs (Was Re: Public Assertions)

2008-11-25 Thread jamie rishaw
These guys need to get a room already. It's clear that the two bills have forgotten that "No U r !!!1" arguments happen on efnet; nanog@ is reserved strictly for "Are any engineers from [insert_company_who_blacklisted_my_company_here] around?" pages. All three of these boys are acting like drama

Re: Public Assertions

2008-11-25 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 18:52, Bill Woodcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Dean Anderson wrote: >> A photo of Bill Woodcock's refused letter is at >> http://www.av8.net/BillWoodcock.jpg That's not a refused letter, that's a certified letter that hasn't yet been mai

Re: Public Assertions

2008-11-25 Thread Bill Woodcock
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Dean Anderson wrote: > A photo of Bill Woodcock's refused letter is at > http://www.av8.net/BillWoodcock.jpg Oh my god... What _is_ that sitting on? Is your desk upholstered with the hides of your victims? Also, I suggest you consult a dictionary. The word "

Re: Public Assertions

2008-11-25 Thread Randy Bush
the bills having a war with dean. how droll. can you maybe take it elsewhere? randy

Re: Public Assertions

2008-11-25 Thread Jeff Shultz
Can anyone explain why we are being exposed to this? From either side? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:56:43AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If I may... I am in possesion of your certified letter > -AND- the sign

Re: Public Assertions

2008-11-25 Thread bmanning
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:56:43AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If I may... I am in possesion of your certified letter > > -AND- the signed acknowledgement that you received notice > > that I have taken po

Re: Public Assertions

2008-11-25 Thread Bill Woodcock
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If I may... I am in possesion of your certified letter > -AND- the signed acknowledgement that you received notice > that I have taken posession of said certified mail. > > please get your facts straight, esp. when

Public Assertions

2008-11-25 Thread bmanning
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:31:21PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote: > (Manning and Woodcock have so far refused to > accept the certified letters) and then sometime in the past 5 days, you posted a comment to DoC here; http://www.ntia.doc.gov/dns/dnssec.html that states: " Bill Manning refused to a