These guys need to get a room already.
It's clear that the two bills have forgotten that "No U r !!!1" arguments
happen on efnet; nanog@ is reserved strictly for "Are any engineers from
[insert_company_who_blacklisted_my_company_here] around?" pages.
All three of these boys are acting like drama queens[1] : dash-bill,
dash-dash-bill and macgyver too for taking a picture of a piece of snail
mail so you could post it on a nerdlist.
| Bill Woodcock / 5:52 PM
| On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Dean Anderson wrote:
| > A photo of Bill Woodcock's refused letter is at [irrelevant]
|
| Oh my god... What _is_ that sitting on? Is your desk upholstered with
the hides of your victims?
Soo.. How do I configure my rooter for that?
gw(config)#ip drama enable
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Computer says no...........
-j
[1] professional history and credentials upon request
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Jim Popovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 18:52, Bill Woodcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Dean Anderson wrote:
> > > A photo of Bill Woodcock's refused letter is at
> > > http://www.av8.net/BillWoodcock.jpg
>
> That's not a refused letter, that's a certified letter that hasn't yet
> been mailed. When refused, the item is signed and stamped (in red
> ink) by the postal delivery agent. It would be very interesting to
> see the image of the other side of the envelope (where postage
> stamp/payment info would appear).
>
> That said... this whole thing has an air of childishness associated with
> it.
>
> -Jim P.
>
>
--
Jamie Rishaw // [EMAIL PROTECTED] <- reverse it. ish.
[Impressive C-level Title Here], arpa / arpa labs
