On 10/15/2011 3:23 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Lynda"
I see that someone has instructed Mailman to munge the reply-to.
Please don't do that. I was about to make a *private* reply to someone, and
realized that the setting had changed, and that I was trapped into
- Original Message -
> From: "Lynda"
> I see that someone has instructed Mailman to munge the reply-to.
> Please don't do that. I was about to make a *private* reply to someone, and
> realized that the setting had changed, and that I was trapped into
> replying to the list.
It's you, Lyn
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:17:58 +0200
Phil Regnauld wrote:
> John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
> > > Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only on
> > > Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the public
> > > service of pointing it out, while asking that
Patrick W. Gilmore (patrick) writes:
>
> Yes, he said he set reply-to himself. Look at your own post, it has no such
> header.
Glenn Sieb (ges) writes:
>
> I think you missed John's last sentence, Phil...
*sigh* back to the coffee machine.
P.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/11 5:17 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
>>> Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps
>>> only on Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm
>>> doing the public service of pointing it
On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
>>> Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only on
>>> Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the public
>>> service of pointing it out, while asking that it be adjuste
John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
> > Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only on
> > Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the public
> > service of pointing it out, while asking that it be adjusted back.
>
> I don't see that; I have to specificall
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:51:55 -0700
Lynda wrote:
>
> I see that someone has instructed Mailman to munge the reply-to. Please
> don't do that. I was about to make a *private* reply to someone, and
> realized that the setting had changed, and that I was trapped into
> replying to the list.
>
>
I see that someone has instructed Mailman to munge the reply-to. Please
don't do that. I was about to make a *private* reply to someone, and
realized that the setting had changed, and that I was trapped into
replying to the list.
Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps
9 matches
Mail list logo
