On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote: > John Peach (john-nanog) writes: >>> Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only on >>> Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the public >>> service of pointing it out, while asking that it be adjusted back. >> >> I don't see that; I have to specifically choose to reply to the list. >> Maybe someone, like me, sets their own reply-to to the list. > > From the headers. > > X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 > Precedence: list > Reply-To: nanog@nanog.org > List-Id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org> > > Mutt asks me, but other mailers might not.
Yes, he said he set reply-to himself. Look at your own post, it has no such header. -- TTFN, patrick