On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
>>> Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only on 
>>> Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the public 
>>> service of pointing it out, while asking that it be adjusted back.
>> 
>> I don't see that; I have to specifically choose to reply to the list.
>> Maybe someone, like me, sets their own reply-to to the list.
> 
>       From the headers.
> 
>       X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
>       Precedence: list
>       Reply-To: nanog@nanog.org
>       List-Id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
> 
>       Mutt asks me, but other mailers might not.

Yes, he said he set reply-to  himself.  Look at your own post, it has no such 
header.

-- 
TTFN,
patrick


Reply via email to