In message <5367fdce.6090...@hpl.hp.com>, Andris Kalnozols writes:
> On 5/3/2014 9:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> > On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> >> Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said:
> ...
> >> Oddly, it seems to be specific to ; any other type request I
On 5/3/2014 9:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said:
...
Oddly, it seems to be specific to ; any other type request I send
comes back NOERROR correctly. It is like somebody tried to handle
"spe
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said:
>> if I ask ns1/2/3/4/5/6.hp.com directly for for onramp01.hpeprint.com.:
>>
>> ; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> onramp01.hpeprint.com. @ns6.hp.com
>> ;; global options: +cmd
>> ;; Got answer:
>> ;;
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> You left out the authority section that refers you to the correct DNS
> servers - ns[1-6].hp.com are not it. They delegate to another set of HP
> servers, which all time out (as stated by the OP) when asked for .
>
Actually the OP said th
Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said:
> if I ask ns1/2/3/4/5/6.hp.com directly for for onramp01.hpeprint.com.:
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> onramp01.hpeprint.com. @ns6.hp.com
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30318
> ;;
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> Either way - it breaks Sendmail, some versions of Exchange, and possibly
> other MTA's. The proper answer to a non-existent record is NOERROR,
> with ANSWER 0.
if I ask ns1/2/3/4/5/6.hp.com directly for for onramp01.hpeprint.com
Either way - it breaks Sendmail, some versions of Exchange, and possibly
other MTA's. The proper answer to a non-existent record is
NOERROR, with ANSWER 0.
Hanging or refusing to answer doesn't result in another attempt to look
for an A record since the name server failed to respond to
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> Dear HP:
>
> If your not going to support IPv6 can you at least not return SRVFAIL when
> asked for an record:
>
They aren't. Your resolver is - or at least, that's what it looks like for
me.
Sending an query to their nameserver
Dear HP:
If your not going to support IPv6 can you at least not return SRVFAIL
when asked for an record:
root@spoons:/etc/mail # dig onramp01.hpeprint.com
; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P4 <<>> onramp01.hpeprint.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status
9 matches
Mail list logo
