I’ve been using PfSense @ home dual-stack on Cox for a year or two. As far as I
can tell any IPv6 problems are Cox issues.
On Apr 5, 2018, at 12:12 PM, Blake Hudson
mailto:bl...@ispn.net>> wrote:
I've used pfSense (BSD firewall) in a dual stack setup. Not all features
are at parity with v4 (th
configuration from their site you could send off
list? Or on list if anyone else is interested.
Thanks,
Robert
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Adam Kennedy via NANOG
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 11:46 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: NG Firewalls & IPv6
We've been usin
I've used pfSense (BSD firewall) in a dual stack setup. Not all features
are at parity with v4 (the captive portal doesn't support v6, for
example), but the core features of stateful firewall, DHCPv6, etc seemed
to work without any fuss.
Joe Klein wrote on 4/2/2018 5:58 PM:
> All,
>
> At security
m> | w: razorblue.com
> >
> > Legal and address information for all Razorblue Group companies can be
> found
> > at www.razorblue.com/contact.
> >
> > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Joe Klein
> > Sent: 02 April 2018 23:58
> &g
boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Joe Klein
> Sent: 02 April 2018 23:58
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: NG Firewalls & IPv6
>
> WARNING: This e-mail originated from outside the Razorblue Group corporate
> network
>
> All,
>
> At security and network tradeshows over th
ue.com/contact.
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Joe Klein
Sent: 02 April 2018 23:58
To: NANOG list
Subject: NG Firewalls & IPv6
WARNING: This e-mail originated from outside the Razorblue Group corporate
network
All,
At security and network tradeshows over the last 15 yea
y via NANOG
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 11:27 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: NG Firewalls & IPv6
We've deployed about a dozen Sophos SG and XG firewalls with IPv6 on WAN, LAN
and VPN with great success. The XG is the firmware with the more modern
appearance and a couple latest-gen
We've deployed about a dozen Sophos SG and XG firewalls with IPv6 on WAN,
LAN and VPN with great success. The XG is the firmware with the more modern
appearance and a couple latest-gen features. But the SG is just as "next
gen" and still has good IPv6 capability.
--
Adam Kennedy, Network & System
Hey Joe,
I don't know how next-gen they'd be considered, but I've had reasonably good
luck with Cisco ASA (v9+), and to a lesser degree Juniper ScreenOS (v6.3+).
Modern-ish ASA does v6-only pretty well; ScreenOS has more v4-dependent
nuances, that I've found.
I do like the NAT64 support in ASA
n’t, but not a bad
experience overall. Does v6 vpn’s great too. Haven’t delved into dynamic
routing protocols on them so can’t speak to that. Happy to answer questions.
David
From: NANOG on behalf of Joe Klein
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 6:58:14 PM
To: NANOG lis
___
> From: NANOG on behalf of Joe Klein
>
> Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 6:58:14 PM
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: NG Firewalls & IPv6
>
> All,
>
> At security and network tradeshows over the last 15 years, I have asked
> companies if their products supporte
list
Subject: NG Firewalls & IPv6
All,
At security and network tradeshows over the last 15 years, I have asked
companies if their products supported "IPv6". They all claimed they did,
but were unable to verify any successful installations. Later they told me
it was on their &quo
All,
At security and network tradeshows over the last 15 years, I have asked
companies if their products supported "IPv6". They all claimed they did,
but were unable to verify any successful installations. Later they told me
it was on their "Roadmap" but were unable to provide an estimated year,
b
13 matches
Mail list logo
