Please contact me off list regarding the Meraki dashboard.
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@olp.net
http://www.btcbroadband.com
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> Can confirm the current ER Lite is a plastic enclosure.
> But for $ 100 I can definitely look past that.
>
At that price point I'm not complaining.
However I do have a preference. ;)
And I do think that the metal cases are a better design - stu
Ray Soucy writes:
> Can confirm the current ER Lite is a plastic enclosure.
I got mine almost a year ago, and mine is plastic too.
> But for $ 100 I can definitely look past that.
Likewise.
> I believe the chips they use are from Cavium [1], but I could be mistaken.
The bootloader output ag
erTip257 wrote:
> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:32:10 -0500
>> From: Ray Soucy
>> To: Rob Seastrom
>>
>> Cc: NANOG
>> Subject: Re: Meraki
>> Message-ID:
>> <
>> calftrnppbqlhrrdkmnt1nz8wi0k3b6kemt9tbgns-wfrhqs...@mail.gmail.com>
&g
On Nov 25, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> It looks like Brocade has swapped out Quagga with IP Infusion's non-free
> version, ZebOS. They also decided to abandon the FOSS Vyatta Core project.
>
> It's really unfortunate, as the FOSS project is the only reason I was
> interested in paying
>
> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:32:10 -0500
> From: Ray Soucy
> To: Rob Seastrom
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: Meraki
> Message-ID:
> <
> calftrnppbqlhrrdkmnt1nz8wi0k3b6kemt9tbgns-wfrhqs...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
&
It looks like Brocade has swapped out Quagga with IP Infusion's non-free
version, ZebOS. They also decided to abandon the FOSS Vyatta Core project.
It's really unfortunate, as the FOSS project is the only reason I was
interested in paying the licensing. It was attractive to have Vyatta Core
as a
On 11/24/13, 7:43 AM, Mike wrote:
On 13-11-23 10:47 PM, Eric C. Miller wrote:
I'm using an EdgeRouter lite in a deployment for a WISP, and it's
holding up very nice. It's only passing 40-50Mbps of basic OSPF
routing, but no complaints thus far for the performance. I've
heard that once you start
Ray Soucy writes:
> Pricing just popped up for the new EdgeRouter PRO last night and I was
> pretty blown away:
>
> $360
>
> For a device with 2 SFP ports, and 2M PPS. That is music to my ears since
> we do a lot of dark fiber around the state even for smaller locations. I'm
> pretty excited t
On 13-11-23 10:47 PM, Eric C. Miller wrote:
> I'm using an EdgeRouter lite in a deployment for a WISP, and it's holding up
> very nice. It's only passing 40-50Mbps of basic OSPF routing, but no
> complaints thus far for the performance. I've heard that once you start
> adding in the services and
he IPv6 GUI support out
of the box.
Eric Miller, CCNP
Network Engineering Consultant
(407) 257-5115
-Original Message-
From: Ray Soucy [mailto:r...@maine.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 7:35 AM
To: Seth Mos
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Meraki
FWIW, I picked up a UniFi 3-pack of APs and bui
NANOG
Subject: Re: Meraki
FWIW, I picked up a UniFi 3-pack of APs and built up a controller VM using
Ubuntu Server LTS and the beta multi-site controller code over the past
week.
I'm very impressed so far, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of
Cisco setup, sure, but I'm p
- Original Message -
> > Anecdote:
> >
> > My local IHOP finally managed to get Wifi internet access in the
> restaurant.
> >
> > For reasons unknown to me, it's a Meraki box, backhauled *over T-mobile*.
> >
> > That's just as unplea
Op 22 nov 2013, om 06:37 heeft Jay Ashworth het volgende geschreven:
> - Original Message -
> Anecdote:
>
> My local IHOP finally managed to get Wifi internet access in the restaurant.
>
> For reasons unknown to me, it's a Meraki box, backhauled *over T-mobil
- Original Message -
> From: "Hank Disuko"
> I'm considering Cisco's Meraki platform for my access layer and I'm
> looking for deployment stories of folks that have deployed Meraki in
> the past...good/bad/ugly kinda stuff.
>
> I know Meraki ha
Meraki does not handle high density environments well, will drop clients. I
also hate the idea of subscription based hardware, we should be moving away
from the nickel and dime model. We deployed Ruckus and couldn't be happier,
running 50+ clients per AP.
Brent Meshier | Amherst Hol
For what it's worth...
We did a conference, KazooCon, with Meraki Gear and Ubiquiti Access Points. I
am not a wizard but I set the whole network up except the access points which
failed to detect at first. I think it took about an hour to setup in total;
really easy even with the stutter
Okay.. Get me my stick.. Morrow is in for it.
;)
Sent from my Mobile Device.
Original message
From: Christopher Morrow
Date: 11/20/2013 7:50 PM (GMT-09:00)
To: Warren Bailey
Cc: Ricky Beam ,nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Meraki
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Warren
ir cheapy AP... so it might
actually work out to do that for each of your employees :)
> Original message
> From: Ricky Beam
> Date: 11/20/2013 11:32 AM (GMT-09:00)
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Meraki
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:36:42 -0500, Ch
:00)
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Meraki
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:36:42 -0500, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> so you just decide: "How many may we have to deploy?"
> then schedule that many pitch meetings with them? :)
Heh. No. It's not supposed to work like that. They want
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:36:42 -0500, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
so you just decide: "How many may we have to deploy?"
then schedule that many pitch meetings with them? :)
Heh. No. It's not supposed to work like that. They want a verifiable
company for the free (cheapest, most basic) AP. And
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:08:53 -0500, Ray Soucy said:
> I'm very interested in other user experiences with Ubiquity for
> smaller deployments vs. traditional Cisco APs and WLC.
> Especially for a collection of rural areas. The price point and
> software controller are very attracti
rdware refresh in one of my offices, which
> will entail replacing about 20 access switches and a couple core devices.
> Pretty simple L3 VLAN environment with VRRP/HSRP, on the physical end I
> have 1G fibre/copper and 10G fibre. My core switch of choice will likely
> be the Cat 4500 s
Meraki did not work for me in a high density office environment, with
heavy wireless usage. Kept dropping clients at peak times. We went with
Aruba.
On 11/19/13 9:25 AM, Hank Disuko wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've traditionally been a Cisco Catalyst shop for my switching gear.
>
Just finished a project doing an entire convention center with Xirrus. Awesome
results and many more options than Meraki. I would say that it was one of
those signature projects that had to happen in a very short schedule and we had
to provide support for the event. Onsite engineers stated
Haha! Don't give up the secrets!!
Sent from my Mobile Device.
Original message
From: Christopher Morrow
Date: 11/19/2013 12:36 PM (GMT-09:00)
To: Warren Bailey
Cc: "Pedersen, Sean" ,NANOG
Subject: Re: Meraki
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Warren Bailey
Check out their forums first.. Look for my name.. ;)
Ubnt has a cool price point.
Sent from my Mobile Device.
Original message
From: Mike Lyon
Date: 11/19/2013 1:18 PM (GMT-09:00)
To: Glenn Robuck
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Meraki
Did you check out ubiquiti's UniFi?
Did you check out ubiquiti's UniFi?
-Mike
> On Nov 19, 2013, at 14:13, Glenn Robuck wrote:
>
> I'm curious if any of you guys have compared Meraki and Xirrus? We are
> currently in the process of picking new WAPs and have narrowed it down to
> these too. We are lean
I'm curious if any of you guys have compared Meraki and Xirrus? We are
currently in the process of picking new WAPs and have narrowed it down to
these too. We are leaning towards Xirrus due to it's modular structure.
It also has a great user interface.
Anyone else evaluate Xirrus
rface and lots of little bells and whistles..
> They have my vote from what we evaluated (ubnt, Blahblahblah).
>
>
> Sent from my Mobile Device.
>
>
> Original message
> From: "Pedersen, Sean"
> Date: 11/19/2013 12:00 PM (GMT-09:00)
>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Warren Bailey
wrote:
> They give you a free ap for listening to their pitch.. We love them.
> Expensive.. But
so you just decide: "How many may we have to deploy?"
then schedule that many pitch meetings with them? :)
Mobile Device.
Original message
From: "Pedersen, Sean"
Date: 11/19/2013 12:00 PM (GMT-09:00)
To: NANOG
Subject: RE: Meraki
I started to look into them for personal and limited small business use, but
stopped short when I realized their cloud management p
I started to look into them for personal and limited small business use, but
stopped short when I realized their cloud management platform is
subscription-based. Unless I've missed something, you cannot deploy your own
internal management platform. It's all licensed through Meraki/Ci
s switches and a couple core devices. Pretty
> simple L3 VLAN environment with VRRP/HSRP, on the physical end I have 1G
> fibre/copper and 10G fibre. My core switch of choice will likely be the Cat
> 4500 series.
>
> I'm considering Cisco's Meraki platform for my access la
nocked out? Built into the GUI. Do you like visuals that actually make some
> goddamn sense? Meraki has it.
>
> I never had to go into the command line for any reason, at least not so far.
>
> I can say they had some issues detecting the ubiquiti access points at a
> client
t actually make some
goddamn sense? Meraki has it.
I never had to go into the command line for any reason, at least not so far.
I can say they had some issues detecting the ubiquiti access points at a client
site but I think that had more to do with faulty internal wiring than anything
else.
sical end I have 1G
fibre/copper and 10G fibre. My core switch of choice will likely be the Cat
4500 series.
I'm considering Cisco's Meraki platform for my access layer and I'm looking for
deployment stories of folks that have deployed Meraki in the
past...good/bad/ugly kinda st
37 matches
Mail list logo
