On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:52 PM, George Bonser wrote:
> What I have done on point to points and small subnets between routers is
> to simply make static neighbor entries. That eliminates any neighbor
> table exhaustion causing the desired neighbors to become unreachable. I
> also do the same wit
>
> Man. It must be annoying to change all those static neighbor entries
> when the interfaces fail, links must be migrated to another line cards
> or you replace routers.
>
> --
Yeah, that happens about once every five years or so and in my
particular case there aren't a lot of these point to
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, George Bonser wrote:
And this is better than just not trying to implement IPv6 stateless
auto-configuration on ptp links in the first place how exactly?
I don't use autoconfiguration. Static configured IPs, static neighbor
entries for these types of links.
Man. It must
> And this is better than just not trying to implement IPv6 stateless
> auto-configuration on ptp links in the first place how exactly?
I don't use autoconfiguration. Static configured IPs, static neighbor
entries for these types of links.
AM
To: Richard A Steenbergen
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table
sizeconsiderations
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:52:37AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
>>
>> What I have done on poin
On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:52:37AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
>>
>> What I have done on point to points and small subnets between routers
>> is to simply make static neighbor entries. That eliminates any
>> neighbor table exhaustio
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:52:37AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
What I have done on point to points and small subnets between routers
is to simply make static neighbor entries. That eliminates any
neighbor table exhaustion causing the desired n
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:52:37AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
>
> What I have done on point to points and small subnets between routers
> is to simply make static neighbor entries. That eliminates any
> neighbor table exhaustion causing the desired neighbors to become
> unreachable. I also d
> If you configure a /64, you are much more likely to have guaranteed
> forwarding speed to that destination, and guaranteed number of routes
> in FIB. What you don't have is a guarantee that ARP/NDP will work
> correctly on the access router. If you choose to configure a /120,
> you may lose one
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:30:17AM +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > Or how they do vlan configurations.
> >
> > I have complained about that, too. With Cisco you add vlans to ports,
> > with Brocade you add ports to vlans. Subtle difference. You can't look
> > at the config and very easily
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 08:52:54PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> > No SNMP stats for virtual vlan interfaces and when asking Brocade
> > about it, you get told "it is too hard to program". You gotta be
> > kiddin me
>
> Yeah, that is something that has been bugging me. No stats on ve
> inter
> > Or how they do vlan configurations.
>
> I have complained about that, too. With Cisco you add vlans to ports,
> with Brocade you add ports to vlans. Subtle difference. You can't look
> at the config and very easily see which vlans are on which ports, you
> have to do something like:
Extreme
> No SNMP stats for virtual vlan interfaces and when asking Brocade
> about it, you get told "it is too hard to program". You gotta be
> kiddin me
Yeah, that is something that has been bugging me. No stats on ve
interfaces.
> Or how they do vlan configurations.
I have complained about that
om.au'; 'nanog@nanog.org'
> > Subject: Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table
> > sizeconsiderations
> >
> > I think this is the point where I get a shovel, a bullwhip and head
> > over to the horse graveyard that is CAM optimization...
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Woodfield [mailto:rek...@semihuman.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 6:11 PM
> To: Chris Enger
> Cc: 'jgood...@studio442.com.au'; 'nanog@nanog.org'
> Subject: Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route t
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 10:13 PM
> To: George Bonser; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table
> sizeconsiderations
>
> That's 1M IPv4 rou
On 3/8/11 10:12 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> That's 1M IPv4 routes, IIRC. Put IPv6 into the mix and that 1M quickly
> shrinks.
>> I am researching possible replacements for our Internet edge
>> routers, and wanted to see what people could recommend for a smaller
>> chassis or fixed router that c
route table
sizeconsiderations
> From: Chris Enger
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:15 PM
> To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
> Subject: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table
> sizeconsiderations
>
> Greetings,
>
> I am researching possible replacements f
; > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:58 PM, George Bonser
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: Chris Enger [mailto:chr...@ci.hillsboro.or.us]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:18 PM
> >> > To: &#x
t; On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:58 PM, George Bonser wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Chris Enger [mailto:chr...@ci.hillsboro.or.us]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:18 PM
>> > To: 'jgood...@studio442.com.au&
Chris Enger [mailto:chr...@ci.hillsboro.or.us]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:18 PM
> > To: 'jgood...@studio442.com.au'; 'nanog@nanog.org'
> > Subject: RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table
> > sizeconsiderations
> >
> > Our Brocade reps poi
gt; -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Enger [mailto:chr...@ci.hillsboro.or.us]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:18 PM
>> To: 'jgood...@studio442.com.au'; 'nanog@nanog.org'
>> Subject: RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table
>&
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Enger [mailto:chr...@ci.hillsboro.or.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:18 PM
> To: 'jgood...@studio442.com.au'; 'nanog@nanog.org'
> Subject: RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table
> sizeconsid
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, George Bonser wrote:
exception I've found so far is the Cisco ASR 1002, which can do 125k v6
along with 500k v4 routes at once. I'm curious if any other vendors
have comparable products.
The NetIron XMR will get you 1,000,000 routes.
1M of what kind of routes?
A Sup720
> From: Chris Enger
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:15 PM
> To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
> Subject: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table
> sizeconsiderations
>
> Greetings,
>
> I am researching possible replacements for our Internet edge
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
