On 2/1/2011 10:10 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
We've sold routers for years, but make it clear to our customer that we are
doing this as a convenience to the customer and that we are not responsible
for it.
I agree with you, but I also know my telco's. It would go horribly wrong. :)
Jack
x27;re familiar with makes
it easier.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Dan White [mailto:dwh...@olp.net]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 9:51 AM
To: Jack Bates
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
On 31/01/11 09:28 -0600, Jack Bates
On 1/31/2011 9:51 AM, Dan White wrote:
That rules out 3rd party firmware like dd-wrt, since the customer is
unlikely to get support when calling the vendor.
At this point, I'd be happy with two good options (two different vendors)
to recommend. So far, D-link is looking good.
Yeah, don't get
On 31/01/11 09:28 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/31/2011 9:23 AM, Chris Conn wrote:
As for the DIR-615, it should, but it doesn't...At least, the E3/E4
revisions I had. I contacted D-LINK support and was able to get a beta
build that seems promising. But DHCP-PD over PPPoE works relatively
we
On 1/31/2011 9:23 AM, Chris Conn wrote:
As for the DIR-615, it should, but it doesn't...At least, the E3/E4
revisions I had. I contacted D-LINK support and was able to get a beta
build that seems promising. But DHCP-PD over PPPoE works relatively
well, minus a couple of little "features". I
On 27/01/11 08:17 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
looking for. The DIR-655 is a more affordable option.
Haven't had the chance to look at that one. Will check it out.
In regards to (2)
On 1/27/11 10:40 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> --- frnk...@iname.com wrote:
> From: "Frank Bulk"
>
> Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
> ---
>
>
>
> Ewww, yuck! "...this router utilizes dual active firewalls (SPI and NAT
On Thu, January 27, 2011 2:31 pm, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On 1/27/11 10:01 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
>> For god's sake, stay away from the DIR-825(Rev A), which has been
effectively abandoned by DLINK support and has no IPv6 support at all.
> pretty sure you can't find those on the shelf...
> The current
unlike a simpler device you can actually turn that off.
in fact it has more knobs than you've likely seen in a consumer cpe...
joel
On 1/27/11 10:40 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> --- frnk...@iname.com wrote:
> From: "Frank Bulk"
>
> Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the thi
On 1/27/11 10:01 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
>
> For god's sake, stay away from the DIR-825(Rev A), which has been
> effectively abandoned by DLINK support and has no IPv6 support at all.
pretty sure you can't find those on the shelf...
The current model I bought on a lark for someone for christmas 2
--- frnk...@iname.com wrote:
From: "Frank Bulk"
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
---
Ewww, yuck! "...this router utilizes dual active firewalls (SPI and NAT) to
prevent potential attacks from across the Internet.
On 01/27/2011 12:46 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On 1/27/11 7:33 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
Nice. New love for D-Link then.
On 1/27/11 7:33 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>
>
> On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
>>
>> The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
>>
>> IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
>
> Nice. New love for D-Link then. I've had DSL modem vendors s
@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
>
> The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
>
> IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
Nice. New love for D-Lin
Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 8:18 AM
To: frnk...@iname.com
Cc: Owen DeLong; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Have yo
On 1/27/2011 9:25 AM, Dan White wrote:
The DIR-825(Rev B) running firmware 2.05NA does. From the status screen:
IPv6 Connection Type : Autoconfiguration (SLAAC/DHCPv6)
Nice. New love for D-Link then. I've had DSL modem vendors sending me
their IPv6 stuff. It's been horrid. Luckily,
On 27/01/11 08:17 -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
looking for. The DIR-655 is a more affordable option.
Haven't had the chance to look at that one. Will check it out.
In regards to (2),
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
looking for. The DIR-655 is a more affordable option.
Haven't had the chance to look at that one. Will check it out.
In regards to (2), is it even possible to do DHCPv6-PD on with
.
Regards,
Janos Mohacsi
- Original Message -
From: "Mirjam Kuehne"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
[apologies for duplicates]
Hello,
Based on new information we rece
er.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:59 AM
To: Owen DeLong
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
I believe it has to do with IPv6 mechanisms for handling native
d somehow in a matrix But 6to4 (or other tunneling
techniques) is only a substitute of real IPv6.
Regards,
Janos Mohacsi
- Original Message -
From: "Mirjam Kuehne"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE surve
is. I already reported to Marco.
>>> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cpe-survey
>>>
>>> It should be included somehow in a matrix But 6to4 (or other tunneling
>>> techniques) is only a substitute of real IPv6.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>&g
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Mirjam Kuehne"
>>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
>>> Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
>>>
>>> [apol
chniques) is only a substitute of real IPv6.
>
> Regards,
> Janos Mohacsi
>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Mirjam Kuehne"
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
>> Subject: Future of the I
> Janos Mohacsi
>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Mirjam Kuehne"
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
>> Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
>>
>>
Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
[apologies for duplicates]
Hello,
Based on new information we received since the last publication, we
updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
In order to make this inform
ure of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
[apologies for duplicates]
Hello,
Based on new information we received since the last publication, we
updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
In order to make this inform
[apologies for duplicates]
Hello,
Based on new information we received since the last publication, we
updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
In order to make this information more useful for a large user base, we
are preparing a
[apologies for duplicates]
Hello,
At the recent RIPE Meeting in Prague, Marco Hogewoning presented the
IPv6 CPE survey he conducted among various vendors. The results are now
published on RIPE Labs. You can find it on the home page
http://labs.ripe.net or you can go directly to:
http://lab
29 matches
Mail list logo
